CLIC Curated Life cycle Inventory Collection

Ammonia

ammonia synthesis catalyst production

Reference product ammonia synthesis catalyst GLO

Published Version 1.0.0 Latest published

Stable dataset identity ammonia-synthesis-catalyst-production

Download Export BibTeX Log in to clone Back to catalog
Unit
kilogram
Reuse license
CC BY 4.0
Published
2026-07-15
Version
1.0.0
Technology maturity
See quality profile

Published inventory

Overview

Scope, source, release context, and stable identifying information.

Description

Carlo d'Angelo et al. 2021 SI

Source

Scientific journal publication

Carlo d'Angelo et al. (2021). Additional details adapted from Boyce, J., Sacchi, R., Goetheer, E., & Steubing, B. (2024). A prospective life cycle assessment of global ammonia decarbonisation scenarios. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27547

Dataset details Expand Collapse

Dataset details

Classification
Ammonia (chemicals/ammonia)
Background database
ecoinvent / 3.9
Background system model
cut-off
Biosphere database
ecoinvent / 3.9
Bookmarks
0
Raw file downloads
0
Generated export downloads
0

These are the source profiles for this version. Foreground modelling assumptions and allocation belong in the dataset description.

Classification path: Chemicals > Ammonia

Keywords

  • ammonia

External references

Log in to bookmark

Technology profile

Technology characterization

Scale, utilization, production, and lifetime data. Missing values remain visible to guide future metadata improvements.

Commercial maturity stage
Mature commercial
Design capacity
Not provided
Design capacity unit
Not provided
Capacity factor
Not provided
Annual production volume
Not provided
Annual production volume unit
Not provided
Annual production volume year
Not provided
Plant lifetime
Not provided

Inventory workspace

Inventory & impacts

Inspect every exchange and its contribution to the selected EF v3.1 indicator.

Precalculated screening profile

Environmental impacts

Results per kilogram, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.

Climate change 1.73353 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Screening result

This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.

Show all 16 indicator totals
Acidification 0.00515505 mol H+-Eq / kilogram
Climate change 1.73353 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Freshwater ecotoxicity 7.19228 CTUe / kilogram
Freshwater eutrophication 0.000813703 kg P-Eq / kilogram
Marine eutrophication 0.00107897 kg N-Eq / kilogram
Terrestrial eutrophication 0.0100787 mol N-Eq / kilogram
Human toxicity, cancer 1.6098e-09 CTUh / kilogram
Human toxicity, non-cancer 5.1994e-08 CTUh / kilogram
Ionising radiation 0.736748 kBq U235-Eq / kilogram
Land use 7.69499 dimensionless / kilogram
Ozone depletion 5.1696e-08 kg CFC-11-Eq / kilogram
Particulate matter 4.0475e-08 disease incidence / kilogram
Photochemical ozone formation 0.00330646 kg NMVOC-Eq / kilogram
Resource use, fossils 27.2036 MJ, net calorific value / kilogram
Resource use, minerals and metals 1.3156e-05 kg Sb-Eq / kilogram
Water use 30.1636 m3 world Eq deprived / kilogram
Calculation details

Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact 4e70d56a85b1 · calculated 2026-10-13 15:00 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.

Dataset contents

Reference flows, emissions, technosphere inputs, and natural resources in this published snapshot.

Outputs

Reference flow

1 row

Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.

Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
ammonia synthesis catalyst production
GLO
ammonia synthesis catalyst
1
kilogram - Reference flow

Inputs

Technosphere inputs

4 rows

Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.

Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
market for lime
RER
lime
0.03
kilogram -
0.025168 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 1.5% of total
BAFU:2025
market for magnetite
GLO
magnetite
0.92
kilogram -
0.47922 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 27.6% of total
BAFU:2025
market for zeolite, powder
GLO
zeolite, powder
0.05
kilogram -
0.221696 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 12.8% of total
BAFU:2025
market group for electricity, high voltage
GLO
electricity, high voltage
1.78
kilowatt hour -
1.00744 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 58.1% of total
BAFU:2025

Parameters

Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.

No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.

Evidence and scrutiny

Quality & review

Assess representativeness and read the public record of the scientific review.

Quality and maturity details Expand Collapse

Quality and maturity

TRL scale Higher is more mature. 9: routine commercial deployment 8: commercial, but still niche or scaling 7: first-commercial or advanced demonstration 6: engineering-scale demonstration 5: pilot or large prototype 4: bench or lab validated 3: research-stage concept Technology readiness level
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: strong market- or operating-data basis 2: commercially plausible, but still somewhat specific 3: partly representative, with modelling or adaptation bias 4: pilot, proxy-based, scaled-up, or prospective 5: weak representation of the real technology state Technological representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: geography matches the claimed scope well 2: regionally credible, but broader or less exact 3: generic regional or global proxy 4: weak proxy or clear geographic mismatch 5: geography is effectively unsupported Geographical representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: current for that technology class 2: slightly dated, but still good 3: dated enough to need caution 4: stale, pilot-era, or prospective relative to current practice 5: clearly not representative of the current state Temporal representativeness

Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Requested

Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.

Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review

Publication route

Curator-led bulk import

This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.

Source inventory archive

No public review transcript is available for this version.

Community

Discussion

Ask public questions, share context, or discreetly report a content problem.

Public discussion

Questions and comments are public. The dataset submitter is notified.

Log in to participate
No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version

Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment. To propose better numerical inventory data, use “Suggest an inventory improvement” in the inventory section.

Log in to report content

Reuse and provenance

Files & versions

Add this version to your basket, inspect original uploads, or open an earlier published snapshot.

Add to download basket

Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.

Log in to add to basket

Raw uploaded files

Contributor files preserved with this public version.

Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.

Version history

Published versions are immutable and remain available.

Version Published Link
Version 1.0.0 2026-07-15 Current view
Back to browse