CLIC Curated Life cycle Inventory Collection

Lithium-sulfur batteries

battery module disassembly, for LiS battery

Reference product disassembled battery module GLO

Published Version 1.0.0 Latest published

Stable dataset identity battery-module-disassembly-for-lis-battery

Download Export BibTeX Log in to clone Back to catalog
Unit
unit
Reuse license
CC BY 4.0
Published
2026-07-15
Version
1.0.0
Technology maturity
See quality profile

Published inventory

Overview

Scope, source, release context, and stable identifying information.

Description

Source: Wickerts et al. (2023). Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c00141

Source

Scientific journal publication

Wickerts et al. (2023). Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.

Dataset details Expand Collapse

Dataset details

Classification
Lithium-sulfur batteries (materials/batteries/li-sulfur)
Background database
ecoinvent / 3.9
Background system model
cut-off
Biosphere database
ecoinvent / 3.9
Bookmarks
0
Raw file downloads
0
Generated export downloads
0

These are the source profiles for this version. Foreground modelling assumptions and allocation belong in the dataset description.

Classification path: Materials > Batteries > Lithium-sulfur batteries

Keywords

  • batteries
  • lithium-sulfur batteries

External references

Log in to bookmark

Technology profile

Technology characterization

Scale, utilization, production, and lifetime data. Missing values remain visible to guide future metadata improvements.

Commercial maturity stage
Demonstration
Design capacity
Not provided
Design capacity unit
Not provided
Capacity factor
Not provided
Annual production volume
Not provided
Annual production volume unit
Not provided
Annual production volume year
Not provided
Plant lifetime
Not provided

Inventory workspace

Inventory & impacts

Inspect every exchange and its contribution to the selected EF v3.1 indicator.

Precalculated screening profile

Environmental impacts

Results per unit, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.

Climate change -147.374 kg CO2-Eq / unit
Screening result

This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.

Show all 16 indicator totals
Acidification -0.51494 mol H+-Eq / unit
Climate change -147.374 kg CO2-Eq / unit
Freshwater ecotoxicity -1200.55 CTUe / unit
Freshwater eutrophication -0.0578924 kg P-Eq / unit
Marine eutrophication -0.0653772 kg N-Eq / unit
Terrestrial eutrophication -1.09758 mol N-Eq / unit
Human toxicity, cancer -1.3588e-07 CTUh / unit
Human toxicity, non-cancer -7.1696e-06 CTUh / unit
Ionising radiation -70.6298 kBq U235-Eq / unit
Land use -536.6 dimensionless / unit
Ozone depletion -4.6763e-06 kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
Particulate matter -3.9012e-06 disease incidence / unit
Photochemical ozone formation -5.55403 kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
Resource use, fossils -2511.69 MJ, net calorific value / unit
Resource use, minerals and metals -0.00190615 kg Sb-Eq / unit
Water use -416.871 m3 world Eq deprived / unit
Calculation details

Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact 4e70d56a85b1 · calculated 2026-09-30 13:44 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.

Dataset contents

Reference flows, emissions, technosphere inputs, and natural resources in this published snapshot.

Outputs

Reference flow

1 row

Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.

Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
battery module disassembly, for LiS battery
GLO
disassembled battery module
-1
unit
Metadata (1)
Comment
Changed to negative
 Reference flow

Inputs

Technosphere inputs

2 rows

Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.

Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
battery cell deactivation, for LiS battery
GLO
cells to deactivation
-18.77
kilogram -
-156.297 kg CO2-Eq / unit 106.1% of total
CLIC v1.0.0
shredding and sorting, module, for LiS battery
GLO
shredded and sorted module components
-6.27
kilogram -
8.92258 kg CO2-Eq / unit -6.1% of total
CLIC v1.0.0

Parameters

Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.

No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.

Evidence and scrutiny

Quality & review

Assess representativeness and read the public record of the scientific review.

Quality and maturity details Expand Collapse

Quality and maturity

TRL scale Higher is more mature. 9: routine commercial deployment 8: commercial, but still niche or scaling 7: first-commercial or advanced demonstration 6: engineering-scale demonstration 5: pilot or large prototype 4: bench or lab validated 3: research-stage concept Technology readiness level
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: strong market- or operating-data basis 2: commercially plausible, but still somewhat specific 3: partly representative, with modelling or adaptation bias 4: pilot, proxy-based, scaled-up, or prospective 5: weak representation of the real technology state Technological representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: geography matches the claimed scope well 2: regionally credible, but broader or less exact 3: generic regional or global proxy 4: weak proxy or clear geographic mismatch 5: geography is effectively unsupported Geographical representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: current for that technology class 2: slightly dated, but still good 3: dated enough to need caution 4: stale, pilot-era, or prospective relative to current practice 5: clearly not representative of the current state Temporal representativeness

Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Requested

Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.

Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review

Publication route

Curator-led bulk import

This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.

Source inventory archive

No public review transcript is available for this version.

Community

Discussion

Ask public questions, share context, or discreetly report a content problem.

Public discussion

Questions and comments are public. The dataset submitter is notified.

Log in to participate
No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version

Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment. To propose better numerical inventory data, use “Suggest an inventory improvement” in the inventory section.

Log in to report content

Reuse and provenance

Files & versions

Add this version to your basket, inspect original uploads, or open an earlier published snapshot.

Add to download basket

Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.

Log in to add to basket

Raw uploaded files

Contributor files preserved with this public version.

Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.

Version history

Published versions are immutable and remain available.

Version Published Link
Version 1.0.0 2026-07-15 Current view
Back to browse