CLIC Curated Life cycle Inventory Collection

Lithium-ion batteries

cathode current collector, LFP

Reference product Cathode current collector, LFP JP

Published Version 1.0.2 Latest published

Stable dataset identity cathode-current-collector-lfp

Download Export BibTeX Log in to clone Back to catalog
Unit
kilogram
Reuse license
CC BY-NC 4.0
Published
2026-11-03
Version
1.0.2
Technology maturity
See quality profile

Published inventory

Overview

Process description and catalog context. View scientific metadata

Description

Provision of 1 kg aluminium cathode current collector for an LFP cell.

Dataset details

Classification, keywords, bookmarks and download counts.

Classification
Lithium-ion batteries (materials/batteries/li-ion)
Bookmarks
0
Raw file downloads
0
Generated export downloads
0

Classification path: Materials > Batteries > Lithium-ion batteries

Keywords

  • batteries
  • lithium-ion batteries
Log in to bookmark
Metadata & sources Methods, scope, reference years, publications, contributors, projects and funding.

Source

Source documentation, background profiles and references.

Other

Supporting sources:

Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., Hischier, R. (2021). Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170, 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619

Qiang Dai; Jarod C. Kelly; Linda Gaines; Michael Wang (2019). Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020048

Background database
ecoinvent / 3.8
Background system model
cut-off
Biosphere database
ecoinvent / 3.8

These are the stored source profiles for this version. Foreground methodology is recorded in Scientific metadata.

External references

Scientific metadata

Reference years, modelling and allocation methods, contributors, publications, projects and funding.

Declarations describe this version's foreground inventory. Missing information is not evidence of a particular allocation method or data origin.

Source publication year
Not specified
Inventory reference year
Not specified
Foreground modelling approach
Not specified
Allocated product inventory
Not specified
Allocation or multifunctionality treatment
Not specified
Inventory contributions
Not specified
Methodology notes
Material supply and rolling are separate stock and processing roles; their amounts do not imply 2 kg retained metal. No additional foil-finishing yield is assigned.
System boundary
Primary aluminium and represented rolling through a mass-based collector reference; active paste and cell assembly are separate.
Technology description
One kg primary aluminium ingot is paired with 1 kg aluminium sheet-rolling service.
Intended application
Mass-based cathode-collector supply within the retained LFP model.
Use limitations
Ingot/rolling proxies do not establish battery-foil gauge, surface treatment, grade, rolling loss or manufacturing scrap recovery.
Data origins
Literature
Other fields not yet completed (6)

Data period start year, Data period end year, Valid until year, Multifunctionality applicable, Process type, Included life cycle stages

Publications (2)
Citation
Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., Hischier, R. (2021). Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170, 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Title
Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries
Doi
10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Source type
Scientific journal
Publication year
2021
Relation
Supporting source
Authors
Eleonora Crenna; Marcel Gauch; Rolf Widmer; Patrick Wäger; Roland Hischier
Citation
Qiang Dai; Jarod C. Kelly; Linda Gaines; Michael Wang (2019). Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020048
Title
Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications
Doi
10.3390/batteries5020048
Url
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020048
Source type
Scientific journal
Publication year
2019
Relation
Supporting source
Authors
Qiang Dai; Jarod C. Kelly · 0000-0002-7804-6506; Linda Gaines; Michael Wang
Projects (1)
Name
Silicon Alloying Anodes for High Energy Density Batteries comprising Lithium Rich Cathodes and Safe Ionic Liquid based Electrolytes for Enhanced High VoltagE Performance
Acronym
Si-DRIVE
Url
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Grant identifier
814464
Relation
Source study
Funding (1)
Organization
European Union · https://ror.org/019w4f821
Award identifier
814464
Project
Silicon Alloying Anodes for High Energy Density Batteries comprising Lithium Rich Cathodes and Safe Ionic Liquid based Electrolytes for Enhanced High VoltagE Performance
Evidence and qualifications (18)
Target field
data_origins
Origin
Source import
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
source
Qualification
Tags describe documented input origins of this exact supplied version. Literature does not assert direct measurements; engineering and proxy tags describe stated assumptions, not validated industrial performance.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.resconrec.2021.105619
Source location
DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Qualification
Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/empa/dload/empa:25212/PDF/view
Source location
Published byline, methods and acknowledgements; SI1 component lineage / SI2 normalized LCI
Qualification
Five paper authors share Technology and Society Laboratory, Empa, St. Gallen. Standardized structured and legacy primary citations are aligned as required by CLIC; freeform source and immutable inventory lineage remain unchanged, and exact archived citation text is retained in guarded before-values. The paper directly models NMC111, NMC811 and NCA; other chemistries need recipe-specific sources. Publication year 2021 is not a universal inventory measurement year. Source study grant 814464 (Si-DRIVE) does not establish funding of CLIC adaptation. Crossmark reports current at retrieval; no additional correction was found in scoped independent searches, which is not proof of absence.
Target field
funding
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Source location
Source-paper acknowledgements and CORDIS Si-DRIVE grant identity
Qualification
Funding is explicitly linked to a project with relation source_study. The EU Horizon 2020 grant supports the cited Crenna study, not necessarily this CLIC adaptation. Do not change the relation to inventory_development or merge European Union with European Commission.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Source location
Original main abstract and SI2 CONTENT/three chemistry inventories; Dai SI TableS1
Qualification
LFP, NMC532, NMC622 and LTO recipes are not directly published complete models in Crenna. Retain methodology and source-study roles without assigning their authors/funding as the developers of the exact CLIC chemistry variant.
Target field
methodology_notes
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Source location
Pinned compiler candidate comparison and original SI2 CONTENT; preservation addendum where applicable
Qualification
Source review retains every exact compiler activity candidate and all explicitly qualified original chemistry-sheet variants before checking quantities. Crenna (2021) directly publishes NMC111, NMC811 and NCA models, normalized in SI2 columns J/K; original amounts in C/E and LCIA sheets have different roles. Compiler equality does not certify native suppliers, uncertainty or a measured inventory period. The explicit chemistry is outside the three complete Crenna models. The Crenna primary-source label is replaced by supporting ancestry; Dai2019 is retained as supporting context, not substituted as a verified primary recipe. No neighbouring-chemistry substitution or coefficient change is proposed.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Design capacity: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Design capacity unit: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Capacity factor (%): Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Annual production volume: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Annual production volume unit: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Annual production volume year: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Plant or represented-asset lifetime (years): Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Commercial maturity stage: mature_commercial. Basis: Retain or propose mature-commercial/9 only as explicit curator assessments of established underlying material-production, LIB component, pack-assembly or distribution classes. These are not source-assigned precise TRLs, certification of the exact substituted recipe, or evidence of complete chemistry-specific recycling. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Technology readiness level: 9. Basis: Retain or propose mature-commercial/9 only as explicit curator assessments of established underlying material-production, LIB component, pack-assembly or distribution classes. These are not source-assigned precise TRLs, certification of the exact substituted recipe, or evidence of complete chemistry-specific recycling. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Technological representativeness: 4. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for native-model or reconstructed/proxy scope, transferred generic suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse prior scores, including geography5 where present. Chinese factory ancestry versus global market must remain distinct; source publication and ecoinvent version are not measured annual production dates. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Geographical representativeness: 3. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for native-model or reconstructed/proxy scope, transferred generic suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse prior scores, including geography5 where present. Chinese factory ancestry versus global market must remain distinct; source publication and ecoinvent version are not measured annual production dates. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Source location
Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Temporal representativeness: 4. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for native-model or reconstructed/proxy scope, transferred generic suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse prior scores, including geography5 where present. Chinese factory ancestry versus global market must remain distinct; source publication and ecoinvent version are not measured annual production dates. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Technology characterization Scale, utilization, production, lifetime, technology readiness and representativeness.
Commercial maturity stage
Mature commercial
Design capacity
Not provided
Design capacity unit
Not provided
Capacity factor
Not provided
Annual production volume
Not provided
Annual production volume unit
Not provided
Annual production volume year
Not provided
Plant lifetime
Not provided
TRL scale Higher is more mature. 9: routine commercial deployment 8: commercial, but still niche or scaling 7: first-commercial or advanced demonstration 6: engineering-scale demonstration 5: pilot or large prototype 4: bench or lab validated 3: research-stage concept Technology readiness level
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: strong market- or operating-data basis 2: commercially plausible, but still somewhat specific 3: partly representative, with modelling or adaptation bias 4: pilot, proxy-based, scaled-up, or prospective 5: weak representation of the real technology state Technological representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: geography matches the claimed scope well 2: regionally credible, but broader or less exact 3: generic regional or global proxy 4: weak proxy or clear geographic mismatch 5: geography is effectively unsupported Geographical representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: current for that technology class 2: slightly dated, but still good 3: dated enough to need caution 4: stale, pilot-era, or prospective relative to current practice 5: clearly not representative of the current state Temporal representativeness

Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Not requested

Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.

Inventory & impacts 3 exchanges · exchange table, supply-chain graph and environmental screening.

Precalculated screening profile

Environmental impacts

Results per kilogram, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.

Climate change 9.35371 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Screening result

This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.

Show all 16 indicator totals
Acidification 0.0454465 mol H+-Eq / kilogram
Climate change 9.35371 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Freshwater ecotoxicity 27.3394 CTUe / kilogram
Freshwater eutrophication 0.00256047 kg P-Eq / kilogram
Marine eutrophication 0.00813525 kg N-Eq / kilogram
Terrestrial eutrophication 0.0664321 mol N-Eq / kilogram
Human toxicity, cancer 1.0699e-08 CTUh / kilogram
Human toxicity, non-cancer 1.7444e-07 CTUh / kilogram
Ionising radiation 5.26159 kBq U235-Eq / kilogram
Land use 16.8009 dimensionless / kilogram
Ozone depletion 1.6161e-07 kg CFC-11-Eq / kilogram
Particulate matter 5.0708e-07 disease incidence / kilogram
Photochemical ozone formation 0.0250413 kg NMVOC-Eq / kilogram
Resource use, fossils 145.317 MJ, net calorific value / kilogram
Resource use, minerals and metals 7.8445e-06 kg Sb-Eq / kilogram
Water use 64.0479 m3 world Eq deprived / kilogram
Calculation details

Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact 4e70d56a85b1 · calculated 2026-11-03 09:06 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.

Dataset contents

Reference flows, emissions, technosphere inputs, and natural resources in this published snapshot.

Outputs

Reference flow 1 row Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.
Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
cathode current collector, LFP
JP
Cathode current collector, LFP
1
kilogram - Reference flow

Inputs

Technosphere inputs 2 rows Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.
Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
aluminium production, primary, ingot
IAI Area, Asia, without China and GCC
aluminium, primary, ingot
1
kilogram -
8.91406 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 95.3% of total
BAFU:2025
market for sheet rolling, aluminium
GLO
sheet rolling, aluminium
1
kilogram -
0.439657 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 4.7% of total
BAFU:2025
Parameters 0 source definitions · values, formulas and uncertainty.

Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.

No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.

Reuse and provenance

Downloads & files

Add this version to your basket, inspect original uploads, or reuse it in your LCA software.

Add to download basket

Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.

Log in to add to basket
Raw uploaded files 0 files preserved with this version.
Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.
Versions & changes 3 versions · change rationale, release notes and comparisons.

Version history

Published versions are immutable and remain available.

Oldest to newest. Arrows show recorded revision links; each node describes the change introduced by that version.

  • Version 1.0.1 revises version 1.0.0.
  • Version 1.0.2 revises version 1.0.1.
  1. Version 1.0.0
    Published

    First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison.

    Superseded
  2. Version 1.0.1
    Published

    No overall rationale was recorded for this version.

    Superseded
  3. Version 1.0.2
    Published

    The source attribution and reuse conditions of cathode current collector, LFP are stated explicitly, alongside consistent catalogue names. The inventory’s component quantities are unchanged.

    Published · Viewing · Latest
Show full version history table (3 versions)
Version Published Reason for this version Link
Version 1.0.2 2026-11-03 The source attribution and reuse conditions of cathode current collector, LFP are stated explicitly, alongside consistent catalogue names. The inventory’s component quantities are unchanged. Current view
Version 1.0.1 Superseded Published 2026-07-21 No overall rationale was recorded for this version. Open version
Version 1.0.0 Superseded Published 2026-07-15 First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison. Open version
Back to browse
About this version

Why this version changed

The source attribution and reuse conditions of cathode current collector, LFP are stated explicitly, alongside consistent catalogue names. The inventory’s component quantities are unchanged.

Release notes

Source: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619.

Declared foreground licence: CC-BY-NC-4.0. Source publications and external supplier inventories retain their own terms.

Changes from version 1.0.1 Compare this version with its predecessor. Exchanges are grouped by type and change; biosphere labels include their environmental compartments. Open the base version. Show changes Hide changes

Why this version changed

The source attribution and reuse conditions of cathode current collector, LFP are stated explicitly, alongside consistent catalogue names. The inventory’s component quantities are unchanged.

Public revision record

This comparison is permanently visible with the published version so users can assess every detected change before reuse.

Modified exchanges
1
Added exchanges
0
Removed exchanges
0
Inventory metadata
0
Version metadata
16
Reference flows modified 1
Reference flows modified
Exchange / scope Field Previous value Revised value Reason
cathode current collector, LFP (production / JP / kilogram) Name Cathode current collector, LFP cathode current collector, LFP Activity and product names now follow consistent catalogue spelling, so the intended inventory and its supplier references remain identifiable.
Metadata changes 16
Metadata changes
Exchange / scope Field Previous value Revised value Reason
Version metadata Description Component or process dataset for Cathode current collector, LFP in the Li-ion battery inventory. See the cited source for chemistry, composition, and modelling assumptions. Provision of 1 kg aluminium cathode current collector for an LFP cell. No explanation was recorded for this change.
Version metadata Geographical representativeness 1 3
Version metadata Publication / citation Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., Hischier, R. (2021). Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170, 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619 Not set
Version metadata Publication DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619 Not set
Version metadata Source type scientific_journal other
Version metadata Contributors, publications, projects and supporting evidence Funding: 1. Project: Url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Funding: 1. Project: Name: Silicon Alloying Anodes for High Energy Density Batteries comprising Lithium Rich Cathodes and Safe Ionic Liquid based Electrolytes for Enhanced High VoltagE Performance
Funding: 1. Project: Acronym: Si-DRIVE
Funding: 1. Project: Relation: source_study
Funding: 1. Project: Grant identifier: 814464
Funding: 1. Organization: Ror: https://ror.org/019w4f821
Funding: 1. Organization: Url: https://european-union.europa.eu/
Funding: 1. Organization: Name: European Union
Funding: 1. Award identifier: 814464
Evidence: 1. Origin: source_import
Evidence: 1. Target field: data_origins
Evidence: 1. Qualification: Tags describe documented input origins of this exact supplied version. Literature does not assert direct measurements; engineering and proxy tags describe stated assumptions, not validated industrial performance.
Evidence: 1. Source location: source
Evidence: 1. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 2. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 2. Target field: publications
Evidence: 2. Qualification: Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Evidence: 2. Source location: DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Evidence: 2. Source reference: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.resconrec.2021.105619
Evidence: 3. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 3. Target field: publications
Evidence: 3. Qualification: Five paper authors share Technology and Society Laboratory, Empa, St. Gallen. Standardized structured and legacy primary citations are aligned as required by CLIC; freeform source and immutable inventory lineage remain unchanged, and exact archived citation text is retained in guarded before-values. The paper directly models NMC111, NMC811 and NCA; other chemistries need recipe-specific sources. Publication year 2021 is not a universal inventory measurement year. Source study grant 814464 (Si-DRIVE) does not establish funding of CLIC adaptation. Crossmark reports current at retrieval; no additional correction was found in scoped independent searches, which is not proof of absence.
Evidence: 3. Source location: Published byline, methods and acknowledgements; SI1 component lineage / SI2 normalized LCI
Evidence: 3. Source reference: https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/empa/dload/empa:25212/PDF/view
Evidence: 4. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 4. Target field: funding
Evidence: 4. Qualification: Funding is explicitly linked to a project with relation source_study. The EU Horizon 2020 grant supports the cited Crenna study, not necessarily this CLIC adaptation. Do not change the relation to inventory_development or merge European Union with European Commission.
Evidence: 4. Source location: Source-paper acknowledgements and CORDIS Si-DRIVE grant identity
Evidence: 4. Source reference: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Projects: 1. Url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Projects: 1. Name: Silicon Alloying Anodes for High Energy Density Batteries comprising Lithium Rich Cathodes and Safe Ionic Liquid based Electrolytes for Enhanced High VoltagE Performance
Projects: 1. Acronym: Si-DRIVE
Projects: 1. Relation: source_study
Projects: 1. Grant identifier: 814464
Publications: 1. Doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Publications: 1. Url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Publications: 1. Title: Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Eleonora Crenna
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Marcel Gauch
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Rolf Widmer
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Patrick Wäger
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Name: Roland Hischier
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Citation: Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., Hischier, R. (2021). Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170, 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Publications: 1. Relation: primary_source
Publications: 1. Source type: scientific_journal
Publications: 1. Publication year: 2021		 Funding: 1. Project: Url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Funding: 1. Project: Name: Silicon Alloying Anodes for High Energy Density Batteries comprising Lithium Rich Cathodes and Safe Ionic Liquid based Electrolytes for Enhanced High VoltagE Performance
Funding: 1. Project: Acronym: Si-DRIVE
Funding: 1. Project: Relation: source_study
Funding: 1. Project: Grant identifier: 814464
Funding: 1. Organization: Ror: https://ror.org/019w4f821
Funding: 1. Organization: Url: https://european-union.europa.eu/
Funding: 1. Organization: Name: European Union
Funding: 1. Award identifier: 814464
Evidence: 1. Origin: source_import
Evidence: 1. Target field: data_origins
Evidence: 1. Qualification: Tags describe documented input origins of this exact supplied version. Literature does not assert direct measurements; engineering and proxy tags describe stated assumptions, not validated industrial performance.
Evidence: 1. Source location: source
Evidence: 1. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 2. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 2. Target field: publications
Evidence: 2. Qualification: Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Evidence: 2. Source location: DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Evidence: 2. Source reference: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2Fj.resconrec.2021.105619
Evidence: 3. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 3. Target field: publications
Evidence: 3. Qualification: Five paper authors share Technology and Society Laboratory, Empa, St. Gallen. Standardized structured and legacy primary citations are aligned as required by CLIC; freeform source and immutable inventory lineage remain unchanged, and exact archived citation text is retained in guarded before-values. The paper directly models NMC111, NMC811 and NCA; other chemistries need recipe-specific sources. Publication year 2021 is not a universal inventory measurement year. Source study grant 814464 (Si-DRIVE) does not establish funding of CLIC adaptation. Crossmark reports current at retrieval; no additional correction was found in scoped independent searches, which is not proof of absence.
Evidence: 3. Source location: Published byline, methods and acknowledgements; SI1 component lineage / SI2 normalized LCI
Evidence: 3. Source reference: https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/empa/dload/empa:25212/PDF/view
Evidence: 4. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 4. Target field: funding
Evidence: 4. Qualification: Funding is explicitly linked to a project with relation source_study. The EU Horizon 2020 grant supports the cited Crenna study, not necessarily this CLIC adaptation. Do not change the relation to inventory_development or merge European Union with European Commission.
Evidence: 4. Source location: Source-paper acknowledgements and CORDIS Si-DRIVE grant identity
Evidence: 4. Source reference: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Evidence: 5. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 5. Target field: publications
Evidence: 5. Qualification: LFP, NMC532, NMC622 and LTO recipes are not directly published complete models in Crenna. Retain methodology and source-study roles without assigning their authors/funding as the developers of the exact CLIC chemistry variant.
Evidence: 5. Source location: Original main abstract and SI2 CONTENT/three chemistry inventories; Dai SI TableS1
Evidence: 5. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Evidence: 6. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 6. Target field: methodology_notes
Evidence: 6. Qualification: Source review retains every exact compiler activity candidate and all explicitly qualified original chemistry-sheet variants before checking quantities. Crenna (2021) directly publishes NMC111, NMC811 and NCA models, normalized in SI2 columns J/K; original amounts in C/E and LCIA sheets have different roles. Compiler equality does not certify native suppliers, uncertainty or a measured inventory period. The explicit chemistry is outside the three complete Crenna models. The Crenna primary-source label is replaced by supporting ancestry; Dai2019 is retained as supporting context, not substituted as a verified primary recipe. No neighbouring-chemistry substitution or coefficient change is proposed.
Evidence: 6. Source location: Pinned compiler candidate comparison and original SI2 CONTENT; preservation addendum where applicable
Evidence: 6. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Evidence: 7. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 7. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 7. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Design capacity: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 7. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 7. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 8. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 8. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 8. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Design capacity unit: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 8. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 8. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 9. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 9. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 9. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Capacity factor (%): Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 9. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 9. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 10. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 10. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 10. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Annual production volume: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 10. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 10. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 11. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 11. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 11. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Annual production volume unit: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 11. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 11. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 12. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 12. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 12. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Annual production volume year: Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 12. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 12. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 13. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 13. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 13. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Plant or represented-asset lifetime (years): Unspecified. Basis: This kg/component/one-kWh reference establishes neither own factory capacity, annual output/year, operating factor nor lifetime. Cell-specific energy, source nominal design and prospective scenario dates remain contextual. Retain own numeric fields unspecified. Per-kg component/supply references and one nominal kWh provision do not identify configured manufacturing-plant capacity, annual output, duty or calendar equipment life. Specific cell/pack energy, quality/film yields, replacement assumptions and laboratory cycles have different scopes. No source-factory schedule or calendar-life transfer is established for this exact current interface. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 13. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 13. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 14. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 14. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 14. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Commercial maturity stage: mature_commercial. Basis: Retain or propose mature-commercial/9 only as explicit curator assessments of established underlying material-production, LIB component, pack-assembly or distribution classes. These are not source-assigned precise TRLs, certification of the exact substituted recipe, or evidence of complete chemistry-specific recycling. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 14. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 14. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 15. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 15. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 15. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Technology readiness level: 9. Basis: Retain or propose mature-commercial/9 only as explicit curator assessments of established underlying material-production, LIB component, pack-assembly or distribution classes. These are not source-assigned precise TRLs, certification of the exact substituted recipe, or evidence of complete chemistry-specific recycling. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 15. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 15. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 16. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 16. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 16. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Technological representativeness: 4. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for native-model or reconstructed/proxy scope, transferred generic suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse prior scores, including geography5 where present. Chinese factory ancestry versus global market must remain distinct; source publication and ecoinvent version are not measured annual production dates. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 16. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 16. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 17. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 17. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 17. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Geographical representativeness: 3. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for native-model or reconstructed/proxy scope, transferred generic suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse prior scores, including geography5 where present. Chinese factory ancestry versus global market must remain distinct; source publication and ecoinvent version are not measured annual production dates. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 17. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 17. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Evidence: 18. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 18. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 18. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-1239. Temporal representativeness: 4. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for native-model or reconstructed/proxy scope, transferred generic suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse prior scores, including geography5 where present. Chinese factory ancestry versus global market must remain distinct; source publication and ecoinvent version are not measured annual production dates. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 18. Source location: Exact approved current recipe and editorial technology/method/limitations; guarded native metadata and original Crenna/Dai/BAT252 ancestry where applicable
Evidence: 18. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622
Projects: 1. Url: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/814464
Projects: 1. Name: Silicon Alloying Anodes for High Energy Density Batteries comprising Lithium Rich Cathodes and Safe Ionic Liquid based Electrolytes for Enhanced High VoltagE Performance
Projects: 1. Acronym: Si-DRIVE
Projects: 1. Relation: source_study
Projects: 1. Grant identifier: 814464
Publications: 1. Doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Publications: 1. Url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Publications: 1. Title: Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Eleonora Crenna
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Marcel Gauch
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Rolf Widmer
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Patrick Wäger
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Name: Roland Hischier
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02x681a42
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.empa.ch/
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Name: Empa, Technology and Society Laboratory, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Publications: 1. Citation: Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., Hischier, R. (2021). Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170, 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619
Publications: 1. Relation: supporting_source
Publications: 1. Source type: scientific_journal
Publications: 1. Publication year: 2021
Publications: 2. Doi: 10.3390/batteries5020048
Publications: 2. Url: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020048
Publications: 2. Title: Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Qiang Dai
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/05gvnxz63
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.anl.gov/
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Jarod C. Kelly
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: 0000-0002-7804-6506
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/05gvnxz63
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.anl.gov/
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Linda Gaines
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/05gvnxz63
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.anl.gov/
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Michael Wang
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/05gvnxz63
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.anl.gov/
Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Name: Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory
Publications: 2. Citation: Qiang Dai; Jarod C. Kelly; Linda Gaines; Michael Wang (2019). Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020048
Publications: 2. Relation: supporting_source
Publications: 2. Source type: scientific_journal
Publications: 2. Publication year: 2019
Version metadata Technological representativeness 2 4
Version metadata Temporal representativeness 2 4
Version metadata Intended application Not set Mass-based cathode-collector supply within the retained LFP model. Apply reviewed discovery metadata and change explanations from the curated release.
Version metadata Methodology and allocation explanation Not set Material supply and rolling are separate stock and processing roles; their amounts do not imply 2 kg retained metal. No additional foil-finishing yield is assigned.
Version metadata System boundary Not set Primary aluminium and represented rolling through a mass-based collector reference; active paste and cell assembly are separate.
Version metadata Technology description Not set One kg primary aluminium ingot is paired with 1 kg aluminium sheet-rolling service.
Version metadata Limitations on use Not set Ingot/rolling proxies do not establish battery-foil gauge, surface treatment, grade, rolling loss or manufacturing scrap recovery.
Version metadata Name Cathode current collector, LFP cathode current collector, LFP Activity and product names now follow consistent catalogue spelling, so the intended inventory and its supplier references remain identifiable.
Version metadata License CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 CC-BY-NC-4.0 Schmidt et al.’s supplementary battery inventory is the corroborated source and declares CC BY-NC 4.0. That source-specific licence replaces the previous article-derived NoDerivatives label.
Version metadata Source Dai, Q., Kelly, J. C., Gaines, L., & Wang, M. (2019). Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications. Batteries, 5(2), 48. Updated and adapted in Crenna et al. (2021) where noted: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619 Supporting sources:

Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., Hischier, R. (2021). Towards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170, 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619

Qiang Dai; Jarod C. Kelly; Linda Gaines; Michael Wang (2019). Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020048		 The source attribution now identifies the publication or inventory underlying this reference (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619) and distinguishes its evidence from the model’s engineering assumptions.
Review & discussion Publication provenance, scientific review and community discussion.
Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review

Publication route

Curator-led bulk import

This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.

No public review transcript is available for this version.
Discussion 0 public comments · questions, context and problem reports.

Public discussion

Questions and comments are public. The dataset submitter is notified.

Log in to participate
No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version

Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment. To propose better numerical inventory data, use “Suggest an inventory improvement” in the inventory section.

Log in to report content