CLIC Curated Life cycle Inventory Collection

Lithium-ion batteries

Cell container

Reference product Cell container GLO

Published Version 1.0.0

Stable dataset identity cell-container-3

Download Export BibTeX Back to catalog
Unit
kilogram
Reuse license
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Published
2026-07-15
Version
1.0.0
Technology maturity
See quality profile

Published inventory

Overview

Scope, source, release context, and stable identifying information.

Description

This dataset is part of the component-based lithium-ion battery inventories adapted by Crenna et al. (2021) from Dai et al. (2019), where battery packs are modelled from their constituent materials, cells, electronics, and packaging. It represents cell container as a structural packaging element that encloses and protects the electrochemical cell.

Source

Scientific journal publication

Dai, Q., Kelly, J. C., Gaines, L., & Wang, M. (2019). Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications. Batteries, 5(2), 48. Updated and adapted in Crenna et al. (2021) where noted: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619

Dataset details Expand Collapse

Dataset details

Classification
Lithium-ion batteries (materials/batteries/li-ion)
Background database
ecoinvent / 3.8
Background system model
cut-off
Biosphere database
ecoinvent / 3.8
Bookmarks
0
Raw file downloads
0
Generated export downloads
0

These are the source profiles for this version. Foreground modelling assumptions and allocation belong in the dataset description.

Classification path: Materials > Batteries > Lithium-ion batteries

Keywords

  • batteries
  • lithium-ion batteries

External references

Log in to bookmark

Technology profile

Technology characterization

Scale, utilization, production, and lifetime data. Missing values remain visible to guide future metadata improvements.

Commercial maturity stage
Mature commercial
Design capacity
Not provided
Design capacity unit
Not provided
Capacity factor
Not provided
Annual production volume
Not provided
Annual production volume unit
Not provided
Annual production volume year
Not provided
Plant lifetime
Not provided

Inventory workspace

Inventory & impacts

Inspect every exchange and its contribution to the selected EF v3.1 indicator.

Precalculated screening profile

Environmental impacts

Results per kilogram, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.

Climate change 5.40663 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Screening result

This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.

Show all 16 indicator totals
Acidification 0.208778 mol H+-Eq / kilogram
Climate change 5.40663 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Freshwater ecotoxicity 76.2787 CTUe / kilogram
Freshwater eutrophication 0.0680318 kg P-Eq / kilogram
Marine eutrophication 0.01426 kg N-Eq / kilogram
Terrestrial eutrophication 0.152 mol N-Eq / kilogram
Human toxicity, cancer 3.9998e-08 CTUh / kilogram
Human toxicity, non-cancer 3.2954e-06 CTUh / kilogram
Ionising radiation 2.32863 kBq U235-Eq / kilogram
Land use 38.2346 dimensionless / kilogram
Ozone depletion 1.8994e-07 kg CFC-11-Eq / kilogram
Particulate matter 5.7201e-07 disease incidence / kilogram
Photochemical ozone formation 0.0450168 kg NMVOC-Eq / kilogram
Resource use, fossils 87.3056 MJ, net calorific value / kilogram
Resource use, minerals and metals 0.000775121 kg Sb-Eq / kilogram
Water use 23.3142 m3 world Eq deprived / kilogram
Calculation details

Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact 4e70d56a85b1 · calculated 2026-09-30 13:46 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.

Dataset contents

Reference flows, emissions, technosphere inputs, and natural resources in this published snapshot.

Outputs

Reference flow

1 row

Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.

Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
Cell container
GLO
Cell container
1
kilogram - Reference flow

Inputs

Technosphere inputs

3 rows

Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.

Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
Multilayer pouch
GLO
Multilayer pouch
0.4
kilogram -
2.96589 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 54.9% of total
BAFU:2025
Tab Aluminum
GLO
Tab Aluminum
0.22
kilogram -
1.1914 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 22.0% of total
BAFU:2025
Tab Copper
GLO
Tab Copper
0.38
kilogram -
1.24934 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 23.1% of total
BAFU:2025

Parameters

Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.

No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.

Evidence and scrutiny

Quality & review

Assess representativeness and read the public record of the scientific review.

Quality and maturity details Expand Collapse

Quality and maturity

TRL scale Higher is more mature. 9: routine commercial deployment 8: commercial, but still niche or scaling 7: first-commercial or advanced demonstration 6: engineering-scale demonstration 5: pilot or large prototype 4: bench or lab validated 3: research-stage concept Technology readiness level
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: strong market- or operating-data basis 2: commercially plausible, but still somewhat specific 3: partly representative, with modelling or adaptation bias 4: pilot, proxy-based, scaled-up, or prospective 5: weak representation of the real technology state Technological representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: geography matches the claimed scope well 2: regionally credible, but broader or less exact 3: generic regional or global proxy 4: weak proxy or clear geographic mismatch 5: geography is effectively unsupported Geographical representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: current for that technology class 2: slightly dated, but still good 3: dated enough to need caution 4: stale, pilot-era, or prospective relative to current practice 5: clearly not representative of the current state Temporal representativeness

Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Not requested

Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.

Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review

Publication route

Curator-led bulk import

This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.

Source inventory archive

No public review transcript is available for this version.

Community

Discussion

Ask public questions, share context, or discreetly report a content problem.

Public discussion

Questions and comments are public. The dataset submitter is notified.

Log in to participate
No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version

Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment. To propose better numerical inventory data, use “Suggest an inventory improvement” in the inventory section.

Log in to report content

Reuse and provenance

Files & versions

Add this version to your basket, inspect original uploads, or open an earlier published snapshot.

Add to download basket

Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.

Log in to add to basket

Raw uploaded files

Contributor files preserved with this public version.

Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.