Description
Manufacture of one charging-stand component.
Trucks and lorries
charging stand
Reference product Charging stand RER
Published
Version 1.0.1
Latest published
Stable dataset identity
charging-stand
- Unit
- unit
- Reuse license
- CC BY 4.0
- Published
- 2026-11-03
- Version
1.0.1- Technology maturity
- Not assessed
Published inventory
Overview
Process description and catalog context. View scientific metadata
Dataset details
Classification, keywords, bookmarks and download counts.
Classification path: Transport > Road transport > Trucks and lorries
Log in to bookmarkMetadata & sources Methods, scope, reference years, publications, contributors, projects and funding.
Source
Source documentation, background profiles and references.
Other
Supporting sources:
Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0
Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf
These are the stored source profiles for this version. Foreground methodology is recorded in Scientific metadata.
Technology characterization Scale, utilization, production, lifetime, technology readiness and representativeness.
- Commercial maturity stage
- Early commercial
- Design capacity
- Not provided
- Design capacity unit
- Not provided
- Capacity factor
- Not provided
- Annual production volume
- Not provided
- Annual production volume unit
- Not provided
- Annual production volume year
- Not provided
- Plant lifetime
- 24 years
Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Not requested
Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.
Inventory & impacts 10 exchanges · exchange table, supply-chain graph and environmental screening.
Precalculated screening profile
Environmental impacts
Results per unit, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.
Acidification
15.2975
mol H+-Eq / unit
Climate change
862.134
kg CO2-Eq / unit
Freshwater ecotoxicity
4862.1
CTUe / unit
Freshwater eutrophication
1.82375
kg P-Eq / unit
Marine eutrophication
0.981155
kg N-Eq / unit
Terrestrial eutrophication
9.95331
mol N-Eq / unit
Human toxicity, cancer
7.1100e-06
CTUh / unit
Human toxicity, non-cancer
5.5791e-05
CTUh / unit
Ionising radiation
218.904
kBq U235-Eq / unit
Land use
5031.89
dimensionless / unit
Ozone depletion
3.4512e-05
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
Particulate matter
5.4034e-05
disease incidence / unit
Photochemical ozone formation
3.76761
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
Resource use, fossils
11092.4
MJ, net calorific value / unit
Resource use, minerals and metals
0.189455
kg Sb-Eq / unit
Water use
6428.22
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
Screening result
This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.
Show all 16 indicator totals
Calculation details
Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact
4e70d56a85b1 · calculated
2026-11-03 09:20 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.
Outputs
Reference flow 1 row Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.
| Exchange | Reference / categories | Amount | Unit | Metadata | Climate change contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
charging stand
RER
|
Charging stand
|
1
|
unit | Reference flow |
Inputs
Technosphere inputs 9 rows Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.
| Exchange | Reference / categories | Amount | Unit | Metadata | Climate change contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
market for copper, cathode
GLO
|
copper, cathode
|
11
|
kilogram |
9.98779
mol H+-Eq / unit
65.3% of total
93.6054
kg CO2-Eq / unit
10.9% of total
807.686
CTUe / unit
16.6% of total
0.223647
kg P-Eq / unit
12.3% of total
0.177966
kg N-Eq / unit
18.1% of total
1.81008
mol N-Eq / unit
18.2% of total
9.8743e-08
CTUh / unit
1.4% of total
3.8798e-06
CTUh / unit
7.0% of total
32.6226
kBq U235-Eq / unit
14.9% of total
736.93
dimensionless / unit
14.6% of total
2.0168e-06
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
5.8% of total
1.1832e-05
disease incidence / unit
21.9% of total
1.04809
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
27.8% of total
1229.1
MJ, net calorific value / unit
11.1% of total
0.000957132
kg Sb-Eq / unit
0.5% of total
83.6223
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
1.3% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
metal working, average for copper product manufacturing
RER
|
metal working, average for copper product manufacturing
|
11
|
kilogram |
0.415208
mol H+-Eq / unit
2.7% of total
15.7169
kg CO2-Eq / unit
1.8% of total
162.365
CTUe / unit
3.3% of total
0.135179
kg P-Eq / unit
7.4% of total
0.0344981
kg N-Eq / unit
3.5% of total
0.37247
mol N-Eq / unit
3.7% of total
5.8790e-08
CTUh / unit
0.8% of total
4.9772e-06
CTUh / unit
8.9% of total
6.88479
kBq U235-Eq / unit
3.1% of total
153.682
dimensionless / unit
3.1% of total
5.3447e-07
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
1.5% of total
1.0616e-06
disease incidence / unit
2.0% of total
0.105438
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
2.8% of total
240.245
MJ, net calorific value / unit
2.2% of total
0.00287746
kg Sb-Eq / unit
1.5% of total
540.813
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
8.4% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
metal working, average for aluminium product manufacturing
RER
|
metal working, average for aluminium product manufacturing
|
1
|
kilogram |
0.0075851
mol H+-Eq / unit
0.0% of total
2.15177
kg CO2-Eq / unit
0.2% of total
7.62179
CTUe / unit
0.2% of total
0.000698272
kg P-Eq / unit
0.0% of total
0.00169456
kg N-Eq / unit
0.2% of total
0.0131692
mol N-Eq / unit
0.1% of total
1.7415e-09
CTUh / unit
0.0% of total
2.7676e-08
CTUh / unit
0.0% of total
1.10499
kBq U235-Eq / unit
0.5% of total
10.4209
dimensionless / unit
0.2% of total
5.9345e-08
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
0.2% of total
7.4856e-08
disease incidence / unit
0.1% of total
0.00497465
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
0.1% of total
33.5883
MJ, net calorific value / unit
0.3% of total
3.0876e-06
kg Sb-Eq / unit
0.0% of total
56.3516
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
0.9% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
market for aluminium, wrought alloy
GLO
|
aluminium, wrought alloy
|
1
|
kilogram |
0.0241428
mol H+-Eq / unit
0.2% of total
4.97414
kg CO2-Eq / unit
0.6% of total
14.6746
CTUe / unit
0.3% of total
0.00131303
kg P-Eq / unit
0.1% of total
0.00441119
kg N-Eq / unit
0.4% of total
0.0358369
mol N-Eq / unit
0.4% of total
5.6276e-09
CTUh / unit
0.1% of total
9.2646e-08
CTUh / unit
0.2% of total
2.71142
kBq U235-Eq / unit
1.2% of total
9.33037
dimensionless / unit
0.2% of total
8.6224e-08
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
0.2% of total
2.7136e-07
disease incidence / unit
0.5% of total
0.0131881
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
0.4% of total
76.5396
MJ, net calorific value / unit
0.7% of total
4.2693e-06
kg Sb-Eq / unit
0.0% of total
34.1722
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
0.5% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
metal working, average for chromium steel product manufacturing
RER
|
metal working, average for chromium steel product manufacturing
|
73
|
kilogram |
0.542681
mol H+-Eq / unit
3.5% of total
150.875
kg CO2-Eq / unit
17.5% of total
566.938
CTUe / unit
11.7% of total
0.0573474
kg P-Eq / unit
3.1% of total
0.119132
kg N-Eq / unit
12.1% of total
1.09304
mol N-Eq / unit
11.0% of total
1.2182e-06
CTUh / unit
17.1% of total
4.1357e-06
CTUh / unit
7.4% of total
52.971
kBq U235-Eq / unit
24.2% of total
908.027
dimensionless / unit
18.0% of total
3.8925e-06
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
11.3% of total
6.4748e-06
disease incidence / unit
12.0% of total
0.395385
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
10.5% of total
2089.46
MJ, net calorific value / unit
18.8% of total
0.00216694
kg Sb-Eq / unit
1.1% of total
3584.72
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
55.8% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
market for steel, chromium steel 18/8
GLO
|
steel, chromium steel 18/8
|
73
|
kilogram |
1.63816
mol H+-Eq / unit
10.7% of total
322.696
kg CO2-Eq / unit
37.4% of total
1080.32
CTUe / unit
22.2% of total
0.120317
kg P-Eq / unit
6.6% of total
0.288806
kg N-Eq / unit
29.4% of total
3.08469
mol N-Eq / unit
31.0% of total
5.1998e-06
CTUh / unit
73.1% of total
1.5805e-05
CTUh / unit
28.3% of total
67.3424
kBq U235-Eq / unit
30.8% of total
1317.2
dimensionless / unit
26.2% of total
4.1332e-06
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
12.0% of total
2.3457e-05
disease incidence / unit
43.4% of total
1.06485
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
28.3% of total
3770.84
MJ, net calorific value / unit
34.0% of total
0.00886183
kg Sb-Eq / unit
4.7% of total
70.6856
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
1.1% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
market for transport, freight, lorry >32 metric ton, EURO6
RER
|
transport, freight, lorry >32 metric ton, EURO6
|
36.05
|
ton kilometer |
0.0217366
mol H+-Eq / unit
0.1% of total
6.214
kg CO2-Eq / unit
0.7% of total
16.1095
CTUe / unit
0.3% of total
0.000608811
kg P-Eq / unit
0.0% of total
0.00814462
kg N-Eq / unit
0.8% of total
0.0873385
mol N-Eq / unit
0.9% of total
2.2281e-09
CTUh / unit
0.0% of total
4.9091e-08
CTUh / unit
0.1% of total
0.726632
kBq U235-Eq / unit
0.3% of total
27.2849
dimensionless / unit
0.5% of total
2.1249e-07
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
0.6% of total
1.8909e-07
disease incidence / unit
0.3% of total
0.0349125
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
0.9% of total
91.0113
MJ, net calorific value / unit
0.8% of total
1.5779e-05
kg Sb-Eq / unit
0.0% of total
7.92472
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
0.1% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
electronics production, for control units
RER
|
electronics, for control units
|
8.25
|
kilogram |
1.47956
mol H+-Eq / unit
9.7% of total
152.918
kg CO2-Eq / unit
17.7% of total
1230.2
CTUe / unit
25.3% of total
0.669794
kg P-Eq / unit
36.7% of total
0.191667
kg N-Eq / unit
19.5% of total
1.9715
mol N-Eq / unit
19.8% of total
3.0846e-07
CTUh / unit
4.3% of total
1.5464e-05
CTUh / unit
27.7% of total
32.0968
kBq U235-Eq / unit
14.7% of total
1087.18
dimensionless / unit
21.6% of total
1.2828e-05
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
37.2% of total
6.5388e-06
disease incidence / unit
12.1% of total
0.648177
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
17.2% of total
2090.69
MJ, net calorific value / unit
18.8% of total
0.0880468
kg Sb-Eq / unit
46.5% of total
1162.94
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
18.1% of total
BAFU:2025
|
|
|
charging interface and controller assembly
|
1
|
unit | - |
1.18066
mol H+-Eq / unit
7.7% of total
112.983
kg CO2-Eq / unit
13.1% of total
976.183
CTUe / unit
20.1% of total
0.61485
kg P-Eq / unit
33.7% of total
0.154836
kg N-Eq / unit
15.8% of total
1.48518
mol N-Eq / unit
14.9% of total
2.1637e-07
CTUh / unit
3.0% of total
1.1361e-05
CTUh / unit
20.4% of total
22.4429
kBq U235-Eq / unit
10.3% of total
781.842
dimensionless / unit
15.5% of total
1.0749e-05
kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
31.1% of total
4.1342e-06
disease incidence / unit
7.7% of total
0.452597
kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
12.0% of total
1470.91
MJ, net calorific value / unit
13.3% of total
0.0865212
kg Sb-Eq / unit
45.7% of total
886.994
m3 world Eq deprived / unit
13.8% of total
|
Parameters 0 source definitions · values, formulas and uncertainty.
Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.
No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.
Supply-chain graph
Direct technosphere and natural-resource inputs appear on the left; emissions appear on the right.
Current dataset
Technosphere inputs
Environmental resource inputs
Emissions
2 CLIC nodes and 8 background boundary nodes shown. Direct inputs appear to the left of the current dataset, while emissions appear to the right. Hover an arrow to inspect its amount and unit, click a blue supplier node to reveal up to three upstream steps, or click an emissions node to open its biosphere flows, then scroll or drag the canvas to navigate.
Reuse and provenance
Downloads & files
Add this version to your basket, inspect original uploads, or reuse it in your LCA software.
Add to download basket
Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.
Raw uploaded files 0 files preserved with this version.
Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.
Versions & changes 2 versions · change rationale, release notes and comparisons.
Version history
Published versions are immutable and remain available.
Oldest to newest. Arrows show recorded revision links; each node describes the change introduced by that version.
- Version 1.0.1 revises version 1.0.0.
-
Version 1.0.0
Published
First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison.
Superseded -
Version 1.0.1
Published
Updates the vehicle inventory to the documented carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe. Model inputs, emissions and associated documentation follow the adopted source model where they differ…
Published · Viewing · Latest
Show full version history table (2 versions)
| Version | Published | Reason for this version | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version 1.0.1 | 2026-11-03 | Updates the vehicle inventory to the documented carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe. Model inputs, emissions and associated documentation follow the adopted source model where they differ from the previous public version. | Current view |
| Version 1.0.0 Superseded | Published 2026-07-15 | First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison. | Open version |
About this version
Why this version changed
Updates the vehicle inventory to the documented carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe. Model inputs, emissions and associated documentation follow the adopted source model where they differ from the previous public version.
Release notes
Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(01)00032-0.
These are modelled vehicle inventories, not measurements of a particular vehicle. The inventory description and model provenance retain the source assumptions and limitations. The declared background and biosphere profiles remain as stored; export conversions do not redefine the authored source.
Declared licence: CC BY 4.0. Source documents and external supplier inventories retain their own terms.
Changes from version 1.0.0 Compare this version with its predecessor. Exchanges are grouped by type and change; biosphere labels include their environmental compartments. Open the base version. Show changes Hide changes
Why this version changed
Updates the vehicle inventory to the documented carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe. Model inputs, emissions and associated documentation follow the adopted source model where they differ from the previous public version.
Public revision record
This comparison is permanently visible with the published version so users can assess every detected change before reuse.
Technosphere exchanges modified 7
| Exchange / scope | Field | Previous value | Revised value | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| market for copper, cathode (technosphere / GLO / kilogram) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | Carries the exchange from the refreshed vehicle-model recipe, using its stored supplier-reference representation. The amount and flow identity are unchanged; this does not establish full upstream equivalence. |
| metal working, average for copper product manufacturing (technosphere / RER / kilogram) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | |
| metal working, average for aluminium product manufacturing (technosphere / RER / kilogram) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | |
| metal working, average for chromium steel product manufacturing (technosphere / RER / kilogram) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | |
| market for steel, chromium steel 18/8 (technosphere / GLO / kilogram) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | |
| market for transport, freight, lorry >32 metric ton, EURO6 (technosphere / RER / ton kilometer) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | |
| electronics production, for control units (technosphere / RER / kilogram) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set |
Technosphere exchanges added 2
| Exchange / scope | Field | Previous value | Revised value | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| market for aluminium, wrought alloy (technosphere / GLO / kilogram) | Amount | Not present | 1 kilogram | Adopt the carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe for the 2020 Regional delivery reference, replacing the earlier vehicle-model inventory consistently. Use the source recipe's market for aluminium, wrought alloy input for this vehicle service, retaining its declared quantity, unit and supplier contract as part of the complete approved model rather than recalibrating one input independently. |
| charging interface and controller assembly production (technosphere / GLO / unit) | Amount | Not present | 1 unit | Adopt the carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe for the 2020 Regional delivery reference, replacing the earlier vehicle-model inventory consistently. Use the source recipe's charging interface and controller assembly production input for this vehicle service, retaining its declared quantity, unit and supplier contract as part of the complete approved model rather than recalibrating one input independently. |
Technosphere exchanges removed 3
| Exchange / scope | Field | Previous value | Revised value | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| display production, liquid crystal, 17 inches (technosphere / GLO / unit) | Amount | 1 unit | Not present | Adopt the carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe for the 2020 Regional delivery reference, replacing the earlier vehicle-model inventory consistently. Use the source recipe's display production, liquid crystal, 17 inches input for this vehicle service, retaining its declared quantity, unit and supplier contract as part of the complete approved model rather than recalibrating one input independently. |
| market for aluminium alloy, AlLi (technosphere / GLO / kilogram) | Amount | 1 kilogram | Not present | Adopt the carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe for the 2020 Regional delivery reference, replacing the earlier vehicle-model inventory consistently. Use the source recipe's market for aluminium alloy, AlLi input for this vehicle service, retaining its declared quantity, unit and supplier contract as part of the complete approved model rather than recalibrating one input independently. |
| computer production, laptop (technosphere / GLO / unit) | Amount | 1 unit | Not present | Adopt the carculator_truck 0.5.2 recipe for the 2020 Regional delivery reference, replacing the earlier vehicle-model inventory consistently. Use the source recipe's computer production, laptop input for this vehicle service, retaining its declared quantity, unit and supplier contract as part of the complete approved model rather than recalibrating one input independently. |
Reference flows modified 1
| Exchange / scope | Field | Previous value | Revised value | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| charging stand (production / RER / unit) | Database | lci-long_haul_trucks | Not set | Retain the declared transport service/reference output while aligning its label and identifiers with the adopted vehicle recipe. |
| Linked database record | lci-trucks / eeffd582e92686e0170d00398f9f6ca8 | Not set | ||
| Name | Charging stand | charging stand |
Metadata changes 20
| Exchange / scope | Field | Previous value | Revised value | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inventory file | Model | Not set | carculator_truck | Documents the refreshed vehicle model, its publication, generation provenance and modelling assumptions. Historical model notes remain as inactive provenance. |
| Inventory file | Model publication | Not set | Sacchi, R., Bauer, C., Cox, B. L. (2021). Does Size Matter? The Influence of Size, Load Factor, Range Autonomy, and Application Type on the Life Cycle Assessment of Current and Future Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology 55(8), 5224-5235. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07773 | |
| Inventory file | Model version | Not set | 0.5.2 | |
| Inventory file | Vehicle inventory provenance | Not set | {"schema version": 1, "family": "truck", "original model": "carculator_truck", "model publication": "Sacchi, R., Bauer, C., Cox, B. L. (2021). Does Size Matter? The Influence of Size, Load Factor, Range Autonomy, and Application Type on the Life Cycle Assessment of Current and Future Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology 55(8), 5224-5235. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07773", "model generation date": "2026-10-14", "libraries": {"carculator_truck": {"version": "0.5.2", "recorded git revision": "4d28ac63a31057dec6879c863370eacae52b1c18"}, "carculator_utils": {"version": "1.3.7", "recorded git revision": "d5479554cbb27ee0be6d11858c9d80697f55a4d6"}}, "source revision boundary": "Recorded repository HEADs; file hashes identify the actual generation sources, including any uncommitted changes.", "source file sha256": {"carculator_truck/carculator_truck/model.py": "9f9d40b6041f5c2673d9beaac509b3efb78a3d52b8474d15ec07e2b42f2d8f72", "carculator_truck/carculator_truck/hybrid_battery.py": "fa91dbc33b1e4374324e5c8166aef11694802ab80e14092518562b5d4e309239", "carculator_truck/carculator_truck/fuel_cell_battery.py": "a2ea3530efd9aba26e6ff84f82e017a3a31f0fc02f47ce5da585b479c21feefa", "carculator_truck/carculator_truck/inventory.py": "071259a94158ae2af32c2690fd8be5182a0256e5cf4edeb3b9e68bbb60fc1d25", "carculator_truck/carculator_truck/data/extra_parameters.json": "466e5826240594c527b1b3e5123b9f4edc1a730fa1f7aef42b26423f16e641ac", "carculator_truck/carculator_truck/data/default_parameters.json": "a1da127f70f6c8eeed62e0c284356a04148e1a24f858b7af3aaba6cf698fbc4e", "carculator_truck/carculator_truck/data/payloads.yaml": "3e08a544e63a48f1a7af2d00b48d44136cbc5b94297344ab9db1bd80ce37b5bb", "carculator_utils/carculator_utils/hot_emissions.py": "f6c0ad5b23ecadbbd70b7680c462fa5ae689456852bc34e377bd192f7fc57e0f", "carculator_utils/carculator_utils/model.py": "105b6465c7008de25994b04945049e1f91f00cf0a49495d82de5362670300b48", "carculator_utils/carculator_utils/energy_consumption.py": "92f955dfcd14d5a8733500d92c8477e1b60e59e0d244ec16409d79f417fab19f", "carculator_utils/dev/regenerate_premise_trucks.py": "f20d31702e910521538a01ca9182e47a1830065ac539ebd10cae080a8592baa9", "carculator_utils/dev/premise_vehicle_battery_metadata.py": "dffd9125283ebfad536aef53520ad25cd5a50465a355d3144f32cf055e5e515b"}, "artifacts": {"raw.json": {"sha256": "34246b8a7b0e5d8a585278299be05e73b3e59da511b93cf57b6026ce13685e18"}, "model_parameters.json": {"sha256": "13462ca8a318f8c9ada1effd66f0695f3aeae1b5548b28d2c6f088c7c2090333"}, "vehicle_parameters.csv": {"sha256": "4edc35daff2c0c2609d6bdac5311a88238350e3dd0a00138a1730d4821e1206f"}, "noise_audit.csv": {"sha256": "2d0d601d9d6902e6cfc399c8651e31ff28ce54f7f55719b53c0172ec3691a050"}}, "baseline year": 2020, "climate": "CH; Swiss annual-average thermal-demand assumptions", "driving cycle": "Regional delivery", "noise boundary": "Direct noise flows omitted from Premise imports; retained in noise_audit.csv identified by SHA-256.", "FCEV battery profile": {"profile": {"nominal_kwh": 25.0, "pack_kg": 238.0, "charge_kw": 36.0, "discharge_kw": 50.0, "discharge_10s_kw": 150.0, "cell_mass_share": 0.7}, "source": "AKASOL AKASYSTEM 15 OEM 37 PRC, May 2021 manufacturer specification, explicit proxy for 2020 FCEV trucks: 25 kWh, 238 kg, 36 kW continuous charge, 50 kW continuous RMS discharge, 150 kW discharge for 10 s. https://www.act-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/210525_LowRes_AK_Datenblatt_AKASystem_15-OEM-37-PRC_2021_2159x2794mm_EN.pdf", "power_boundary": "Continuous charging cap after direct auxiliary use; instantaneous cycle discharge bounded by the continuous RMS rating, without repeated pulse assumptions. Rated motor buffer also bounded by the 10-second discharge rating.", "sizing": "Maximum of inherited 20 kWh + 6% H2 energy floor, cycle continuous-discharge requirement and rated short-pulse requirement. Explicit capacity retained and validated.", "mass_boundary": "Complete pack 238 kg per 25 kWh; 70% cell allocation and NMC-622 manufacture are retained proxies, not measured AKASOL cell specifications.", "limits": "Conditioned-pack proxy; no electrothermal, ageing, SOC-window or fuel-cell ramp validation. Generic chemistry costs and replacement assumptions retained.", "lca_proxy": "MIX capacity market per nominal kWh including replacements; physical mass mismatch documented without mass-equivalence correction.", "future_hardware": "Premise retains the regenerated 2020 FCEV hardware; no runtime cycle simulation.", "approved_on": "2026-10-14"}, "role": "bundled component", "metadata updated": "2026-10-14", "baseline identity": {"name": "charging stand, carculator regional truck 2020", "reference product": "charging stand", "location": "RER", "unit": "unit"}, "component source boundary": "Bundled component recipe exported with the model; model year and climate do not date or parameterize this component. Its literature source is recorded separately.", "activity source": "https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(01)00032-0"} | |
| Version metadata | Description | One charging-stand component with73kg steel,11kg copper,1kg aluminium and8.25kg grouped electronics, processing and36.05tkm freight. Historical stand also buys a whole laptop and17inch monitor; current published successor replaces these with industrial interface/controller equipment. Material grade, electronic function and transport basis remain qualified. Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Current charger/stand retain generic-wrought aluminium50/1kg instead of AlLi, and the stand replaces one laptop/17inch screen with an industrial interface/controller. Five current predecessor/rationale hashes are verified. Do not reverse these corrections or infer that8.25kg grouped stand electronics includes the replaced computer/display. Historical recipes and later native zero-laptop entries remain distinct evidence. Charger freight120tkm is consistent with600kg×200km. Stand36.05tkm would imply180.25kg at200km versus the earlier100kg total, or360.5km if100kg is retained. This is an unresolved source/functional mass-distance convention; no isolated numerical candidate is proposed. Preserved HMI/PLC changes and stationary-battery chemistry further complicate direct rescaling. |
Manufacture of one charging-stand component. | Describe charging stand by its actual reference flow, recorded inputs and applicable source qualifications instead of curation instructions and historical decision logs. |
| Version metadata | Design capacity | 100.000000 | Not set | No explanation was recorded for this change. |
| Version metadata | Design capacity unit | kW | Not set | |
| Version metadata | Geographical representativeness | 2 | 3 | |
| Version metadata | Intended application | Charging-infrastructure equipment reference for LCA, preserving the exact hardware/capacity/installation basis; not a direct delivered-electricity or vehicle-kilometre inventory. | Reuse of the current stand with its distinct interface and material references. | |
| Version metadata | Methodology and allocation explanation | Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Current charger/stand retain generic-wrought aluminium50/1kg instead of AlLi, and the stand replaces one laptop/17inch screen with an industrial interface/controller. Five current predecessor/rationale hashes are verified. Do not reverse these corrections or infer that8.25kg grouped stand electronics includes the replaced computer/display. Historical recipes and later native zero-laptop entries remain distinct evidence. Charger freight120tkm is consistent with600kg×200km. Stand36.05tkm would imply180.25kg at200km versus the earlier100kg total, or360.5km if100kg is retained. This is an unresolved source/functional mass-distance convention; no isolated numerical candidate is proposed. Preserved HMI/PLC changes and stationary-battery chemistry further complicate direct rescaling. | Earlier Nansai Table 3 is a numerical comparator for the material reference, not a recovered table from the later 2001 paper. The current industrial interface replaces the historical laptop/monitor functions; generic wrought aluminium replaces the earlier misidentified alloy. The 8.25 kg grouped-electronics allowance is separate from that replaced interface. | |
| Version metadata | Source | Supporting sources: Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0; Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf | Supporting sources: Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf |
|
| Version metadata | Source type | scientific_journal | other | |
| Version metadata | Contributors, publications, projects and supporting evidence | Evidence: 1. Origin: source_import Evidence: 1. Target field: publications Evidence: 1. Qualification: Append/deduplicate these references within this version. Preserve original_citation/original_doi and reconcile any existing primary source. Model ancestry is not automatically inventory authorship. Evidence: 1. Source location: source Evidence: 1. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation Evidence: 2. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 2. Target field: publications Evidence: 2. Qualification: Append/deduplicate these references within this version. Preserve original_citation/original_doi and reconcile any existing primary source. Model ancestry is not automatically inventory authorship. Evidence: 2. Source location: Publisher-deposited registry /message/title, /message/published and /message/author Evidence: 2. Source reference: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0306-2619%2801%2900032-0 Evidence: 3. Origin: source_import Evidence: 3. Target field: data_origins Evidence: 3. Qualification: Documented inputs to this compilation/model, not newly measured data. Omitted tags remain unspecified. Literature denotes cited inventory sources. Evidence: 3. Source location: source Evidence: 3. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation Evidence: 4. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 4. Target field: publications Evidence: 4. Qualification: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Historical2001 affiliations are supported by NIES annual bibliography: Nansai/Moriguchi at NIES, Tohno/Kasahara at Kyoto University, Kono at Toshiba International Fuel Cells. Nansai's primary ORCID is0000-0002-2449-1874; other unverified identifiers remain blank. Kyoto University (02kpeqv85) is not its museum; NIES (02hw5fp67) is not the Environment Ministry. Toshiba International Fuel Cells is not automatically the parent Toshiba corporation. ABB E-mobility and generic ABB publisher roles remain separate and no unrelated ABB-acronym ROR is assigned. Evidence: 4. Source location: NIES2003 annual bibliography, printed106; byline and historical external affiliations Evidence: 4. Source reference: https://www.nies.go.jp/en/pr/publications/annual/ae-9-2003.pdf Evidence: 5. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 5. Target field: methodology_notes Evidence: 5. Qualification: Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Current charger/stand retain generic-wrought aluminium50/1kg instead of AlLi, and the stand replaces one laptop/17inch screen with an industrial interface/controller. Five current predecessor/rationale hashes are verified. Do not reverse these corrections or infer that8.25kg grouped stand electronics includes the replaced computer/display. Historical recipes and later native zero-laptop entries remain distinct evidence. Charger freight120tkm is consistent with600kg×200km. Stand36.05tkm would imply180.25kg at200km versus the earlier100kg total, or360.5km if100kg is retained. This is an unresolved source/functional mass-distance convention; no isolated numerical candidate is proposed. Preserved HMI/PLC changes and stationary-battery chemistry further complicate direct rescaling. Evidence: 5. Source location: Original source tables and frozen revision rationale Evidence: 5. Source reference: https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Evidence: 6. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 6. Target field: funding Evidence: 6. Qualification: Primary2001 publisher acknowledgment identifies JSPS Research for the Future project Distributed Autonomous Urban Energy System for Mitigating Environmental Impact,JSPS-RFTF97P01002; recovered2000 paper independently prints the same award. Canonical JSPS (00hhkn466) differs from its London office (02m7axw05). NIES's B-55 research-topic classification is not an interchangeable grant number or proof of funding of later CLIC/ABB adaptations. No funding/project declarations are propagated to these adapters. Evidence: 6. Source location: 2000 printed281 acknowledgment;2001 publisher acknowledgment preview Evidence: 6. Source reference: https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Publications: 1. Doi: 10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Publications: 1. Url: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Publications: 1. Title: Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Keisuke Nansai Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: 0000-0002-2449-1874 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02hw5fp67 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.nies.go.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: National Institute for Environmental Studies Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Susumu Tohno Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02kpeqv85 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: Kyoto University Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Motoki Kono Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: Toshiba International Fuel Cells Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Mikio Kasahara Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02kpeqv85 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Name: Kyoto University Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Name: Yuichi Moriguchi Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02hw5fp67 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.nies.go.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Name: National Institute for Environmental Studies Publications: 1. Citation: Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Publications: 1. Relation: supporting_source Publications: 1. Source type: scientific_journal Publications: 1. Publication year: 2001 Publications: 2. Doi: Not set Publications: 2. Url: https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Publications: 2. Title: Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Keisuke Nansai Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: 0000-0002-2449-1874 Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Motoki Kono Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Susumu Tohno Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Mikio Kasahara Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 5. Name: Yuichi Moriguchi Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 5. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Citation: Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Publications: 2. Relation: supporting_source Publications: 2. Source type: scientific_journal Publications: 2. Publication year: 2000 |
Evidence: 1. Origin: source_import Evidence: 1. Target field: publications Evidence: 1. Qualification: Append/deduplicate these references within this version. Preserve original_citation/original_doi and reconcile any existing primary source. Model ancestry is not automatically inventory authorship. Evidence: 1. Source location: source Evidence: 1. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation Evidence: 2. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 2. Target field: publications Evidence: 2. Qualification: Append/deduplicate these references within this version. Preserve original_citation/original_doi and reconcile any existing primary source. Model ancestry is not automatically inventory authorship. Evidence: 2. Source location: Publisher-deposited registry /message/title, /message/published and /message/author Evidence: 2. Source reference: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0306-2619%2801%2900032-0 Evidence: 3. Origin: source_import Evidence: 3. Target field: data_origins Evidence: 3. Qualification: Documented inputs to this compilation/model, not newly measured data. Omitted tags remain unspecified. Literature denotes cited inventory sources. Evidence: 3. Source location: source Evidence: 3. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation Evidence: 4. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 4. Target field: publications Evidence: 4. Qualification: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Historical2001 affiliations are supported by NIES annual bibliography: Nansai/Moriguchi at NIES, Tohno/Kasahara at Kyoto University, Kono at Toshiba International Fuel Cells. Nansai's primary ORCID is0000-0002-2449-1874; other unverified identifiers remain blank. Kyoto University (02kpeqv85) is not its museum; NIES (02hw5fp67) is not the Environment Ministry. Toshiba International Fuel Cells is not automatically the parent Toshiba corporation. ABB E-mobility and generic ABB publisher roles remain separate and no unrelated ABB-acronym ROR is assigned. Evidence: 4. Source location: NIES2003 annual bibliography, printed106; byline and historical external affiliations Evidence: 4. Source reference: https://www.nies.go.jp/en/pr/publications/annual/ae-9-2003.pdf Evidence: 5. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 5. Target field: methodology_notes Evidence: 5. Qualification: Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Current charger/stand retain generic-wrought aluminium50/1kg instead of AlLi, and the stand replaces one laptop/17inch screen with an industrial interface/controller. Five current predecessor/rationale hashes are verified. Do not reverse these corrections or infer that8.25kg grouped stand electronics includes the replaced computer/display. Historical recipes and later native zero-laptop entries remain distinct evidence. Charger freight120tkm is consistent with600kg×200km. Stand36.05tkm would imply180.25kg at200km versus the earlier100kg total, or360.5km if100kg is retained. This is an unresolved source/functional mass-distance convention; no isolated numerical candidate is proposed. Preserved HMI/PLC changes and stationary-battery chemistry further complicate direct rescaling. Evidence: 5. Source location: Original source tables and frozen revision rationale Evidence: 5. Source reference: https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Evidence: 6. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 6. Target field: funding Evidence: 6. Qualification: Primary2001 publisher acknowledgment identifies JSPS Research for the Future project Distributed Autonomous Urban Energy System for Mitigating Environmental Impact,JSPS-RFTF97P01002; recovered2000 paper independently prints the same award. Canonical JSPS (00hhkn466) differs from its London office (02m7axw05). NIES's B-55 research-topic classification is not an interchangeable grant number or proof of funding of later CLIC/ABB adaptations. No funding/project declarations are propagated to these adapters. Evidence: 6. Source location: 2000 printed281 acknowledgment;2001 publisher acknowledgment preview Evidence: 6. Source reference: https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Evidence: 7. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 7. Target field: methodology_notes Evidence: 7. Qualification: Manifest-verified historical decision NB-BOUNDED-2971. Preserve the identified prior repair and its source/profile qualifications. Exact agreement is not blanket approval of every other amount, provider, uncertainty or future version. Original decision rationale: Compose only the source-verified corrections recorded in audit ordinals 48; preserve the remaining curated model, original paired profiles and published history. Original qualification: The individual cited source/proxy and engineering limitations remain binding. No complete-model replacement, performance change, new recovery credit or blanket background migration is authorized. Specific prior repair evidence: Freshly downloaded original Nansai2000 Japanese PDF p4/printed277 Table3 was visually inspected: aluminium is50kg per600kg charger and1kg per100kg charging stand. It specifies generic aluminium, not AlLi; the identity changes retain both quantities exactly. This earlier original is a numerical comparator, not proof every detail matches the later cited2001 Applied Energy paper. Full historical diff preserves steel/electronics, output/scaling, supplier quantities and uncertainty. Wrought alloy remains an explicit engineering proxy. This does not restore the source stationary storage: the user's charger equipment-only boundary remains binding. Source hardware vintage, power rating and later dedicated station references need independent review. Evidence: 7. Source location: Historical preservation register P013/P014 or scoped H-series review; original encoding and approval boundaries retained Evidence: 7. Source reference: Manifest-verified prior correction/source/migration decisions and exact archive guards Evidence: 8. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 8. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 8. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Design capacity: Unspecified. Basis: The 100 kW annotation belongs to a scaled outer charger reference. This standalone600 kg component or passive stand has no established own electrical rating; preserve the former value as contextual provenance rather than attribute it to this output. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 8. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 8. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 9. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 9. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 9. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Design capacity unit: Unspecified. Basis: The 100 kW annotation belongs to a scaled outer charger reference. This standalone600 kg component or passive stand has no established own electrical rating; preserve the former value as contextual provenance rather than attribute it to this output. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 9. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 9. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 10. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 10. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 10. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Capacity factor (%): Unspecified. Basis: No additional own operating parameter established. Manufacturing/validity/revision dates, source scenario years, material retention and equipment rating do not establish annual observed output or plant capacity factor. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 10. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 10. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 11. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 11. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 11. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Annual production volume: Unspecified. Basis: No additional own operating parameter established. Manufacturing/validity/revision dates, source scenario years, material retention and equipment rating do not establish annual observed output or plant capacity factor. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 11. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 11. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 12. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 12. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 12. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Annual production volume unit: Unspecified. Basis: No additional own operating parameter established. Manufacturing/validity/revision dates, source scenario years, material retention and equipment rating do not establish annual observed output or plant capacity factor. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 12. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 12. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 13. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 13. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 13. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Annual production volume year: Unspecified. Basis: No additional own operating parameter established. Manufacturing/validity/revision dates, source scenario years, material retention and equipment rating do not establish annual observed output or plant capacity factor. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 13. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 13. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 14. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 14. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 14. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Plant or represented-asset lifetime (years): 24. Basis: Retain existing24-year compiler reference horizon with an explicit scope question; it is not established manufacturer durability or a measured failure distribution. Retain guarded current numeric values only in their explicitly identified device/model roles. Keep manufacture versus operation, installation versus hardware life, continuous/peak/input/output ratings, efficiency versus capacity factor, material yield and actual annual production distinct. Unsupported own fields remain unspecified; no factory throughput, operating observation year or additional calendar life inferred. Evidence classification: source parameter and exact reference scope review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values and explicit gaps. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 14. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 14. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 15. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 15. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 15. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Commercial maturity stage: early_commercial. Basis: Clear exact numerical readiness for this adapted model. Retain existing broad early-commercial classification only as qualified prior model context, not a source-assigned maturity assessment of the precise recipe. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 15. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 15. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 16. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 16. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 16. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Technology readiness level: Unspecified. Basis: Clear exact numerical readiness for this adapted model. Retain existing broad early-commercial classification only as qualified prior model context, not a source-assigned maturity assessment of the precise recipe. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 16. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 16. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 17. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 17. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 17. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Technological representativeness: 4. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for reconstructed geometry, material and integration scope, transferred suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse existing scores. Manufacturer edition, EPD date and source background release are not factory measurement or production years. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 17. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 17. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 18. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 18. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 18. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Geographical representativeness: 3. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for reconstructed geometry, material and integration scope, transferred suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse existing scores. Manufacturer edition, EPD date and source background release are not factory measurement or production years. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 18. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 18. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Evidence: 19. Origin: editor_verification Evidence: 19. Target field: technology_description Evidence: 19. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-2971. Temporal representativeness: 4. Basis: Curator technology/geography/time 4/3/4 for reconstructed geometry, material and integration scope, transferred suppliers and unresolved observation vintage. Preserve worse existing scores. Manufacturer edition, EPD date and source background release are not factory measurement or production years. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan. Evidence: 19. Source location: Exact current recipe and source/EPD/design/replacement reconstruction; variant-specific manufacturer documentation where recorded Evidence: 19. Source reference: https://zenodo.org/records/23935622 Publications: 1. Doi: 10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Publications: 1. Url: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Publications: 1. Title: Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Keisuke Nansai Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: 0000-0002-2449-1874 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02hw5fp67 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.nies.go.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: National Institute for Environmental Studies Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Susumu Tohno Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02kpeqv85 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: Kyoto University Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Motoki Kono Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: Toshiba International Fuel Cells Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Mikio Kasahara Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02kpeqv85 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 4. Affiliations: 1. Name: Kyoto University Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Name: Yuichi Moriguchi Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Orcid: Not set Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/02hw5fp67 Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Url: https://www.nies.go.jp/ Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 5. Affiliations: 1. Name: National Institute for Environmental Studies Publications: 1. Citation: Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0 Publications: 1. Relation: supporting_source Publications: 1. Source type: scientific_journal Publications: 1. Publication year: 2001 Publications: 2. Doi: Not set Publications: 2. Url: https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Publications: 2. Title: Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Name: Keisuke Nansai Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: 0000-0002-2449-1874 Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Name: Motoki Kono Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Susumu Tohno Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Name: Mikio Kasahara Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 4. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 5. Name: Yuichi Moriguchi Publications: 2. Scientific authors: 5. Orcid: Not set Publications: 2. Citation: Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf Publications: 2. Relation: supporting_source Publications: 2. Source type: scientific_journal Publications: 2. Publication year: 2000 |
|
| Version metadata | System boundary | One charging-stand component with73kg steel,11kg copper,1kg aluminium and8.25kg grouped electronics, processing and36.05tkm freight. Historical stand also buys a whole laptop and17inch monitor; current published successor replaces these with industrial interface/controller equipment. Material grade, electronic function and transport basis remain qualified. Component/reference-unit manufacturing or aggregate installation only, as specified above. Vehicle operation, grid electricity delivery, efficiency, utilization and pervehicle allocation require separate service models. |
Stand material/component manufacture and represented freight; charger power electronics, buffer battery, site operation and delivered electricity are separate. | |
| Version metadata | Technological representativeness | 2 | 4 | |
| Version metadata | Technology description | One charging-stand component with73kg steel,11kg copper,1kg aluminium and8.25kg grouped electronics, processing and36.05tkm freight. Historical stand also buys a whole laptop and17inch monitor; current published successor replaces these with industrial interface/controller equipment. Material grade, electronic function and transport basis remain qualified. | The reference supplies 73 kg steel, 11 kg copper, 1 kg wrought aluminium, grouped electronics, one industrial interface/controller, processing and 36.05 tkm freight. | |
| Version metadata | Technology readiness level | 8 | Not set | |
| Version metadata | Temporal representativeness | 3 | 4 | |
| Version metadata | Limitations on use | Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Historical200kW charger uses4.3 equivalents of the600kg component, consistent with2×1290/600. ABB's1290kg row is rated100kW, while PSI2023 Table70 calls it200kW; the retained coefficient therefore includes an additional factor2 relative to the report's literal mass wording. Historical450kW scaling is(3×1340+500)/600=7.533333333. Manufacturer masses do not establish linear electrical-power scaling or the2000 electronics fraction in modern hardware. Current4675 replaces the legacy charger/stand/buffer assembly with1.2 integrated200kW hardware equivalents, one foundation and negative retirement/packaging demands. Current4676 buys the separate450kW station and WEEE demand; it no longer buys the old stand or buffer battery. Preserve these documented equipment-only replacements, including absence of dedicated stationary storage; do not restore Nansai's battery or treat the vehicle-model2020 climate/cycle as this component's measurement year. Recovered ABB Terra184 PEP ABBG-00284-V01.01-EN was issuedJuly2023, with395kg180kW hardware,25kg packaging,458kg foundation and10year reference life. Its functional unit is1kWh supplied in the defined operating scenario, whereas CLIC hardware outputs one equipment unit. Do not import EPD use-phase electricity, headline impacts or lifetime denominator into component manufacture. Current200kW hardware scales Terra184 material masses by200/180, giving438.888889kg total,430kg assigned classes and8.888889kg unassigned miscellaneous material. Keep that gap visible instead of normalizing it away. Source steel197kg×200/180 is split between ordinary steel and a grade430 shell within the same budget. Shell geometry/grade, material providers, wood500kg/m3 density and backgrounds are compiler assumptions, not a manufacturer200kW BOM. Source percentages use the full878kg station reference; do not treat them as percentages of395kg hardware. Current200kW installation retains12/10=1.2 expected hardware equivalents: the hardware's10years is sourced, installation12years is an inherited assumption. Foundation450kg concrete plus8kg steel is purchased/retired once, with2400kg/m3 concrete. WEEE−526.666667kg excludes packaging; wood−29.333333kg and PE−4kg cover all deliveries once. Preserve negative waste-service signs, paired background profiles and absence of double-counted foundation steel. No discrete replacement timetable or recycling credit is inferred. ABB PantoUP RevB January2021 confirms450kW from three1340kg150kW cabinets,7inch service HMI, and a separate pole/interface specification. It lists45kg contact dome and500kg control-box/pole rows; whether500kg includes the dome is not established here. Current station's500kg support recipe,10m cable, one shared2kg industrial HMI/PLC and aggregate4613.576kg retirement are engineering assumptions, not a certified full station BOM. Do not add a second onboard pantograph to offboard infrastructure without checking callers. Current charger/stand retain generic-wrought aluminium50/1kg instead of AlLi, and the stand replaces one laptop/17inch screen with an industrial interface/controller. Five current predecessor/rationale hashes are verified. Do not reverse these corrections or infer that8.25kg grouped stand electronics includes the replaced computer/display. Historical recipes and later native zero-laptop entries remain distinct evidence. Storage is currently800kWh nominal LFP manufacturing-capacity demand, not800kWh delivered electricity and not a source4000kg lead-acid inventory. Historical CONT market is a different technology basket. Chemistry, mass/capacity transfer, service life, cycling and current supplier boundary need original stationary-battery evidence before changes. Freight800tkm would imply200km at the earlier4tonne mass; that does not certify the LFP system mass. Charger freight120tkm is consistent with600kg×200km. Stand36.05tkm would imply180.25kg at200km versus the earlier100kg total, or360.5km if100kg is retained. This is an unresolved source/functional mass-distance convention; no isolated numerical candidate is proposed. Preserved HMI/PLC changes and stationary-battery chemistry further complicate direct rescaling. Historical2001 affiliations are supported by NIES annual bibliography: Nansai/Moriguchi at NIES, Tohno/Kasahara at Kyoto University, Kono at Toshiba International Fuel Cells. Nansai's primary ORCID is0000-0002-2449-1874; other unverified identifiers remain blank. Kyoto University (02kpeqv85) is not its museum; NIES (02hw5fp67) is not the Environment Ministry. Toshiba International Fuel Cells is not automatically the parent Toshiba corporation. ABB E-mobility and generic ABB publisher roles remain separate and no unrelated ABB-acronym ROR is assigned. Primary2001 publisher acknowledgment identifies JSPS Research for the Future project Distributed Autonomous Urban Energy System for Mitigating Environmental Impact,JSPS-RFTF97P01002; recovered2000 paper independently prints the same award. Canonical JSPS (00hhkn466) differs from its London office (02m7axw05). NIES's B-55 research-topic classification is not an interchangeable grant number or proof of funding of later CLIC/ABB adaptations. No funding/project declarations are propagated to these adapters. Crossmark explicitly reports no available data for the2001 DOI, rather than current status. Scoped DOI/title/erratum/supplement searches locate no authoritative correction, amended supplement or retraction; full2001 text and any historic supplementary inventory remain unavailable locally. Earlier2000 original and2021/2023 manufacturer documents are different sources, not published corrections of2001. ABB PEP issue/revision and PantoUP revision are pinned; later product revisions do not automatically amend this frozen equipment model. |
The freight intensity does not agree uniquely with the earlier 100 kg/200 km convention. Actual electronic function, total retained mass, steel grade and transport basis remain qualified. A passive stand does not inherit the charger's 100 kW rating. | |
| Version metadata | Name | Charging stand | charging stand | Standardized capitalization; the dataset identity and reference basis are retained. |
Review & discussion Publication provenance, scientific review and community discussion.
Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review
Publication route
Curator-led bulk import
This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.
No public review transcript is available for this version.
Discussion 0 public comments · questions, context and problem reports.
Public discussion
No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version
Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment. To propose better numerical inventory data, use “Suggest an inventory improvement” in the inventory section.
Log in to report content