CLIC Curated Life cycle Inventory Collection

Wave electricity

curing agent 97652 production

Reference product Curing Agent 97652 RER

Published Version 1.0.1 Latest published

Stable dataset identity curing-agent-97652-production

Download Export BibTeX Log in to clone Back to catalog
Unit
kilogram
Reuse license
CC BY 4.0
Published
2026-11-03
Version
1.0.1
Technology maturity
See quality profile

Published inventory

Overview

Process description and catalog context. View scientific metadata

Description

Composition-based supply proxy for 1 kg of Hempel Curing Agent 97652 used in the Pelamis coating model.

Dataset details

Classification, keywords, bookmarks and download counts.

Classification
Wave electricity (energy/electricity/wave)
Bookmarks
0
Raw file downloads
0
Generated export downloads
0

Classification path: Energy > Electricity > Wave electricity

Keywords

  • electricity
  • wave electricity
Log in to bookmark
Metadata & sources Methods, scope, reference years, publications, contributors, projects and funding.

Source

Source documentation, background profiles and references.

Scientific journal publication

R. Camilla Thomson; John P. Chick; Gareth P. Harrison (2019). An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2. Corrected supplementary inventory: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf. Correction notice (2022): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y

Background database
ecoinvent / 3.8
Background system model
cut-off
Biosphere database
ecoinvent / 3.8

These are the stored source profiles for this version. Foreground methodology is recorded in Scientific metadata.

External references

Scientific metadata

Reference years, modelling and allocation methods, contributors, publications, projects and funding.

Declarations describe this version's foreground inventory. Missing information is not evidence of a particular allocation method or data origin.

Source publication year
2019
Inventory reference year
Not specified
Foreground modelling approach
Not specified
Allocated product inventory
Not specified
Allocation or multifunctionality treatment
Not specified
Inventory contributions
Not specified
Projects
Not specified
Methodology notes
The selected remainder is 0.51375 kg/kg mixture. Several amine and phenol constituents are represented by different available substances, including separate ethylenediamine rows; these substitutions are retained as proxies.

Study context
This sub-process supports the source’s Pelamis P1 case. Its own reference is distinct from the whole-device rating, 20-year operating life and annual electricity estimate. The 2022 corrected supplement is used; publication/correction dates do not establish this activity’s measurement period.
System boundary
Selected ingredient supplies per kg curing agent; no independently measured factory manufacture, application emissions or end-of-life process is added.
Included life cycle stages
Manufacturing
Technology description
Solvents, amines, phenol-related and other ingredient proxies follow supplementary Table S1.6; the unspecified remainder is represented by liquid epoxy resin.
Intended application
Represent this specified component, material or operation within the Pelamis P1 foreground hierarchy, using the stated functional reference.
Use limitations
Source safety-data-sheet ranges and surrogate substances do not establish an exact commercial formulation or validated factory inventory.

Background and uncertainty
The source uses ecoinvent 3.3 and pedigree/lognormal uncertainty with Monte Carlo analysis. Current supplier mappings and deterministic central quantities do not reproduce that full stochastic study. Supplier compatibility, source proxy chemistry and omitted processes remain qualified; matching central values does not validate environmental results.
Data origins
Literature, Proxy
Other fields not yet completed (5)

Data period start year, Data period end year, Valid until year, Multifunctionality applicable, Process type

Publications (1)
Citation
R. Camilla Thomson; John P. Chick; Gareth P. Harrison (2019). An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2. Corrected supplementary inventory: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf. Correction notice (2022): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y
Title
An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter
Doi
10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source type
Scientific journal
Publication year
2019
Relation
Primary source
Authors
R. Camilla Thomson; John P. Chick; Gareth P. Harrison
Funding (1)
Organization
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · https://ror.org/0439y7842
Award identifier
EP/P504902/1
Evidence and qualifications (21)
Target field
data_origins
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
source
Qualification
Exact documented origins; no claim that every flow is measured.
Target field
data_origins
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
description
Qualification
Exact documented origins; no claim that every flow is measured.
Target field
included_life_cycle_stages
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
name
Qualification
Only the documented supplied function; component recipes do not inherit the full parent lifecycle. Manufacturing rejects do not imply product end of life.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
description
Qualification
Exact supplied process description; not industrial certification or a whole-study boundary.
Target field
use_limitations
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
description
Qualification
Explicit source composition/proxy qualifications.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2
Source location
DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Qualification
Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Target field
funding
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Acknowledgments
Qualification
EPSRC studentship EP/P504902/1 supported the source study. This declaration does not assert funding of CLIC compilation or review.
Target field
use_limitations
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Sections 3.2 and 3.5; supplied CLIC inventory exchange records
Qualification
Original ecoinvent 3.3 supplier choices and pedigree uncertainty are distinguished from current central-value proxy mappings.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Original bylines, author affiliations, acknowledgements, correction notice and exact ROR records
Qualification
The original source byline is R. Camilla Thomson, John P. Chick and Gareth P. Harrison, all at the School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh. Preserve the 2019 journal issue year alongside first online publication in 2018; the corrected publication/supplement is from 2022. University of Edinburgh ROR 01nrxwf90 is distinct from Edinburgh Napier University. EPSRC ROR 0439y7842 identifies the source studentship EP/P504902/1. Former Pelamis Wave Power Ltd staff provided technical support; this does not establish an additional award or legal-parent identity. Preserve existing explicitly qualified source-study funding and CLIC compiler attribution. Earlier generator-count, transport-unit and polyurethane source-conflict qualifications remain applicable; no new inventory comparison or quantity correction is asserted.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Design capacity: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Design capacity unit: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Capacity factor (%): Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Annual production volume: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Annual production volume unit: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Annual production volume year: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Plant or represented-asset lifetime (years): Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Commercial maturity stage: mature_commercial. Basis: Curator assessment of the established underlying conventional equipment, fabrication, coating or infrastructure class. The host wave/ERS technology's maturity does not automatically describe the supplier. This is not an author-assigned numerical TRL or certification of exact recipe completeness. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Technology readiness level: 9. Basis: Curator assessment of the established underlying conventional equipment, fabrication, coating or infrastructure class. The host wave/ERS technology's maturity does not automatically describe the supplier. This is not an author-assigned numerical TRL or certification of exact recipe completeness. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Technological representativeness: 4. Basis: Retain existing conservative technology score 4 for source engineering and material/service proxies. Agreement with an individual source parameter does not establish full inventory closure. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Geographical representativeness: 3. Basis: Generic Scottish deployment and UK manufacture with transferred supplier proxies justify curator geography 3 for retained references, not a measured regional-fleet sample. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Target field
technology_description
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Source location
Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Qualification
Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Temporal representativeness: 4. Basis: Source installation 2006, validity 2006–2010, online 2018, issue 2019 and correction 2022 are different dates. They do not establish an observed annual-output year or current operational representativeness. Use conservative historical/mixed curator temporal score 4. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Technology characterization Scale, utilization, production, lifetime, technology readiness and representativeness.
Commercial maturity stage
Mature commercial
Design capacity
Not provided
Design capacity unit
Not provided
Capacity factor
Not provided
Annual production volume
Not provided
Annual production volume unit
Not provided
Annual production volume year
Not provided
Plant lifetime
Not provided
TRL scale Higher is more mature. 9: routine commercial deployment 8: commercial, but still niche or scaling 7: first-commercial or advanced demonstration 6: engineering-scale demonstration 5: pilot or large prototype 4: bench or lab validated 3: research-stage concept Technology readiness level
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: strong market- or operating-data basis 2: commercially plausible, but still somewhat specific 3: partly representative, with modelling or adaptation bias 4: pilot, proxy-based, scaled-up, or prospective 5: weak representation of the real technology state Technological representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: geography matches the claimed scope well 2: regionally credible, but broader or less exact 3: generic regional or global proxy 4: weak proxy or clear geographic mismatch 5: geography is effectively unsupported Geographical representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: current for that technology class 2: slightly dated, but still good 3: dated enough to need caution 4: stale, pilot-era, or prospective relative to current practice 5: clearly not representative of the current state Temporal representativeness

Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Requested

Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.

Inventory & impacts 11 exchanges · exchange table, supply-chain graph and environmental screening.

Precalculated screening profile

Environmental impacts

Results per kilogram, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.

Climate change 4.6769 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Screening result

This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.

Show all 16 indicator totals
Acidification 0.0298786 mol H+-Eq / kilogram
Climate change 4.6769 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram
Freshwater ecotoxicity 171.187 CTUe / kilogram
Freshwater eutrophication 0.000264292 kg P-Eq / kilogram
Marine eutrophication 0.00831974 kg N-Eq / kilogram
Terrestrial eutrophication 0.0850228 mol N-Eq / kilogram
Human toxicity, cancer 1.9392e-09 CTUh / kilogram
Human toxicity, non-cancer 8.1258e-08 CTUh / kilogram
Ionising radiation 0.133312 kBq U235-Eq / kilogram
Land use 7.32236 dimensionless / kilogram
Ozone depletion 6.4268e-08 kg CFC-11-Eq / kilogram
Particulate matter 7.8884e-07 disease incidence / kilogram
Photochemical ozone formation 0.0252549 kg NMVOC-Eq / kilogram
Resource use, fossils 96.9836 MJ, net calorific value / kilogram
Resource use, minerals and metals 1.9545e-05 kg Sb-Eq / kilogram
Water use 0.225019 m3 world Eq deprived / kilogram
Calculation details

Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact 4e70d56a85b1 · calculated 2026-11-03 09:22 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.

Dataset contents

Reference flows, emissions, technosphere inputs, and natural resources in this published snapshot.

Outputs

Reference flow 1 row Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.
Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
curing agent 97652 production
RER
Curing Agent 97652
1
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
Reference production exchange of this foreground dataset; amount 1 per dataset reference unit.
 Reference flow

Inputs

Technosphere inputs 10 rows Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.
Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
market for xylene
RER
xylene
0.16
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.1625 kg xylene per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.192253 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 4.1% of total
BAFU:2025
market for 1-butanol
GLO
1-butanol
0.09
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.085 kg n-butanol per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.360485 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 7.7% of total
BAFU:2025
market for phenol
RER
phenol
0.07
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.075 kg p-tert-butylphenol, represented by phenol per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.275004 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 5.9% of total
BAFU:2025
market for meta-phenylene diamine
GLO
meta-phenylene diamine
0.04
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.04 kg m-xylylene-diamine, represented by meta-phenylene diamine per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.000211891 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 0.0% of total
BAFU:2025
market for ethanol, without water, in 99.7% solution state, from ethylene
RER
ethanol, without water, in 99.7% solution state, from ethylene
0.03
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.03 kg ethanol per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.0509694 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 1.1% of total
BAFU:2025
market for ethyl benzene
RER
ethyl benzene
0.05
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.05 kg ethylbenzene per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.11618 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 2.5% of total
BAFU:2025
market for ethylenediamine
RER
ethylenediamine
0.02
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.0175 kg trimethylhexamethylene diamine, represented by ethylenediamine per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.0802887 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 1.7% of total
BAFU:2025
market for o-aminophenol
GLO
o-aminophenol
0.02
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.02 kg 2,4,6-tris(dimethylaminomethyl)phenol, represented by o-aminophenol per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.0394548 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 0.8% of total
BAFU:2025
market for ethylenediamine
RER
ethylenediamine
6.25e-03
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.00625 kg aminoethylaminopropyltrimethoxysilane, represented by ethylenediamine per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
0.0286745 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 0.6% of total
BAFU:2025
market for epoxy resin, liquid
RER
epoxy resin, liquid
0.51
kilogram
Metadata (1)
Comment
0.51375 kg unspecified remainder, represented by liquid epoxy resin per kg Curing Agent 97652, from Supplementary Table S1.6.
3.53337 kg CO2-Eq / kilogram 75.5% of total
BAFU:2025
Parameters 0 source definitions · values, formulas and uncertainty.

Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.

No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.

Reuse and provenance

Downloads & files

Add this version to your basket, inspect original uploads, or reuse it in your LCA software.

Add to download basket

Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.

Log in to add to basket
Raw uploaded files 0 files preserved with this version.
Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.
Versions & changes 2 versions · change rationale, release notes and comparisons.

Version history

Published versions are immutable and remain available.

Oldest to newest. Arrows show recorded revision links; each node describes the change introduced by that version.

  • Version 1.0.1 revises version 1.0.0.
  1. Version 1.0.0
    Published

    First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison.

    Superseded
  2. Version 1.0.1
    Published

    Activity and product names for curing agent 97652 production now use consistent catalogue spelling across the inventory and its supplier references. The physical recipe…

    Published · Viewing · Latest
Show full version history table (2 versions)
Version Published Reason for this version Link
Version 1.0.1 2026-11-03 Activity and product names for curing agent 97652 production now use consistent catalogue spelling across the inventory and its supplier references. The physical recipe is unchanged. Current view
Version 1.0.0 Superseded Published 2026-07-15 First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison. Open version
Back to browse
About this version

Why this version changed

Activity and product names for curing agent 97652 production now use consistent catalogue spelling across the inventory and its supplier references. The physical recipe is unchanged.

Release notes

Source: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y.

Declared foreground licence: CC-BY-4.0. Source publications and external supplier inventories retain their own terms.

Changes from version 1.0.0 Compare this version with its predecessor. Exchanges are grouped by type and change; biosphere labels include their environmental compartments. Open the base version. Show changes Hide changes

Why this version changed

Activity and product names for curing agent 97652 production now use consistent catalogue spelling across the inventory and its supplier references. The physical recipe is unchanged.

Public revision record

This comparison is permanently visible with the published version so users can assess every detected change before reuse.

Modified exchanges
1
Added exchanges
0
Removed exchanges
0
Inventory metadata
0
Version metadata
14
Reference flows modified 1
Reference flows modified
Exchange / scope Field Previous value Revised value Reason
curing agent 97652 production (production / RER / kilogram) Name Curing Agent 97652 production curing agent 97652 production Activity and product names now follow consistent catalogue spelling, so the intended inventory and its supplier references remain identifiable.
Metadata changes 14
Metadata changes
Exchange / scope Field Previous value Revised value Reason
Version metadata Commercial maturity stage pilot mature_commercial No explanation was recorded for this change.
Version metadata Description Composition proxy for 1 kg of Hempel Curing Agent 97652, based on the safety data sheet and Supplementary Table S1.6. Several constituents are represented by the proxy substances selected by the authors; the unspecified remainder is liquid epoxy resin. Composition-based supply proxy for 1 kg of Hempel Curing Agent 97652 used in the Pelamis coating model.
Version metadata Geographical representativeness 2 3
Version metadata Publication / citation Thomson, R.C., Chick, J.P. & Harrison, G.P. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2; supplementary inventory Tables S1.1-S1.10: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf; 2022 correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y R. Camilla Thomson; John P. Chick; Gareth P. Harrison (2019). An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2. Corrected supplementary inventory: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf. Correction notice (2022): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y
Version metadata Source Thomson, R.C., Chick, J.P. & Harrison, G.P. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2; supplementary inventory Tables S1.1-S1.10: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf; 2022 correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y R. Camilla Thomson; John P. Chick; Gareth P. Harrison (2019). An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2. Corrected supplementary inventory: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf. Correction notice (2022): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y
Version metadata Contributors, publications, projects and supporting evidence Funding: 1. Project: Not set
Funding: 1. Organization: Ror: https://ror.org/0439y7842
Funding: 1. Organization: Url: Not set
Funding: 1. Organization: Name: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Funding: 1. Award identifier: EP/P504902/1
Evidence: 1. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 1. Target field: data_origins
Evidence: 1. Qualification: Exact documented origins; no claim that every flow is measured.
Evidence: 1. Source location: source
Evidence: 1. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 2. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 2. Target field: data_origins
Evidence: 2. Qualification: Exact documented origins; no claim that every flow is measured.
Evidence: 2. Source location: description
Evidence: 2. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 3. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 3. Target field: included_life_cycle_stages
Evidence: 3. Qualification: Only the documented supplied function; component recipes do not inherit the full parent lifecycle. Manufacturing rejects do not imply product end of life.
Evidence: 3. Source location: name
Evidence: 3. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 4. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 4. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 4. Qualification: Exact supplied process description; not industrial certification or a whole-study boundary.
Evidence: 4. Source location: description
Evidence: 4. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 5. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 5. Target field: use_limitations
Evidence: 5. Qualification: Explicit source composition/proxy qualifications.
Evidence: 5. Source location: description
Evidence: 5. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 6. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 6. Target field: publications
Evidence: 6. Qualification: Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Evidence: 6. Source location: DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Evidence: 6. Source reference: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 7. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 7. Target field: funding
Evidence: 7. Qualification: EPSRC studentship EP/P504902/1 supported the source study. This declaration does not assert funding of CLIC compilation or review.
Evidence: 7. Source location: Acknowledgments
Evidence: 7. Source reference: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 8. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 8. Target field: use_limitations
Evidence: 8. Qualification: Original ecoinvent 3.3 supplier choices and pedigree uncertainty are distinguished from current central-value proxy mappings.
Evidence: 8. Source location: Sections 3.2 and 3.5; supplied CLIC inventory exchange records
Evidence: 8. Source reference: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 9. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 9. Target field: publications
Evidence: 9. Qualification: The original source byline is R. Camilla Thomson, John P. Chick and Gareth P. Harrison, all at the School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh. Preserve the 2019 journal issue year alongside first online publication in 2018; the corrected publication/supplement is from 2022. University of Edinburgh ROR 01nrxwf90 is distinct from Edinburgh Napier University. EPSRC ROR 0439y7842 identifies the source studentship EP/P504902/1. Former Pelamis Wave Power Ltd staff provided technical support; this does not establish an additional award or legal-parent identity. Preserve existing explicitly qualified source-study funding and CLIC compiler attribution. Earlier generator-count, transport-unit and polyurethane source-conflict qualifications remain applicable; no new inventory comparison or quantity correction is asserted.
Evidence: 9. Source location: Original bylines, author affiliations, acknowledgements, correction notice and exact ROR records
Evidence: 9. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Publications: 1. Doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Publications: 1. Url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Publications: 1. Title: An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Name: R. Camilla Thomson
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3DW, UK
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Name: John P. Chick
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3DW, UK
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Gareth P. Harrison
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3DW, UK
Publications: 1. Citation: Thomson, R.C., Chick, J.P. & Harrison, G.P. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2; supplementary inventory Tables S1.1-S1.10: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf; 2022 correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y
Publications: 1. Relation: primary_source
Publications: 1. Source type: scientific_journal
Publications: 1. Publication year: 2019		 Funding: 1. Project: Not set
Funding: 1. Organization: Ror: https://ror.org/0439y7842
Funding: 1. Organization: Url: Not set
Funding: 1. Organization: Name: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Funding: 1. Award identifier: EP/P504902/1
Evidence: 1. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 1. Target field: data_origins
Evidence: 1. Qualification: Exact documented origins; no claim that every flow is measured.
Evidence: 1. Source location: source
Evidence: 1. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 2. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 2. Target field: data_origins
Evidence: 2. Qualification: Exact documented origins; no claim that every flow is measured.
Evidence: 2. Source location: description
Evidence: 2. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 3. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 3. Target field: included_life_cycle_stages
Evidence: 3. Qualification: Only the documented supplied function; component recipes do not inherit the full parent lifecycle. Manufacturing rejects do not imply product end of life.
Evidence: 3. Source location: name
Evidence: 3. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 4. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 4. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 4. Qualification: Exact supplied process description; not industrial certification or a whole-study boundary.
Evidence: 4. Source location: description
Evidence: 4. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 5. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 5. Target field: use_limitations
Evidence: 5. Qualification: Explicit source composition/proxy qualifications.
Evidence: 5. Source location: description
Evidence: 5. Source reference: Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Evidence: 6. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 6. Target field: publications
Evidence: 6. Qualification: Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Evidence: 6. Source location: DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Evidence: 6. Source reference: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 7. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 7. Target field: funding
Evidence: 7. Qualification: EPSRC studentship EP/P504902/1 supported the source study. This declaration does not assert funding of CLIC compilation or review.
Evidence: 7. Source location: Acknowledgments
Evidence: 7. Source reference: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 8. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 8. Target field: use_limitations
Evidence: 8. Qualification: Original ecoinvent 3.3 supplier choices and pedigree uncertainty are distinguished from current central-value proxy mappings.
Evidence: 8. Source location: Sections 3.2 and 3.5; supplied CLIC inventory exchange records
Evidence: 8. Source reference: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 9. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 9. Target field: publications
Evidence: 9. Qualification: The original source byline is R. Camilla Thomson, John P. Chick and Gareth P. Harrison, all at the School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh. Preserve the 2019 journal issue year alongside first online publication in 2018; the corrected publication/supplement is from 2022. University of Edinburgh ROR 01nrxwf90 is distinct from Edinburgh Napier University. EPSRC ROR 0439y7842 identifies the source studentship EP/P504902/1. Former Pelamis Wave Power Ltd staff provided technical support; this does not establish an additional award or legal-parent identity. Preserve existing explicitly qualified source-study funding and CLIC compiler attribution. Earlier generator-count, transport-unit and polyurethane source-conflict qualifications remain applicable; no new inventory comparison or quantity correction is asserted.
Evidence: 9. Source location: Original bylines, author affiliations, acknowledgements, correction notice and exact ROR records
Evidence: 9. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 10. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 10. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 10. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Design capacity: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 10. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 10. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 11. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 11. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 11. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Design capacity unit: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 11. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 11. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 12. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 12. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 12. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Capacity factor (%): Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 12. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 12. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 13. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 13. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 13. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Annual production volume: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 13. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 13. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 14. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 14. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 14. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Annual production volume unit: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 14. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 14. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 15. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 15. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 15. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Annual production volume year: Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 15. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 15. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 16. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 16. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 16. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Plant or represented-asset lifetime (years): Unspecified. Basis: Retain own reference scope; a per-kg, per-area, per-hour or procurement unit does not establish annual factory output or inherit the whole-device operating life. Own equipment/represented-asset parameters, manufacturing scope, operating-service intensities and component technical lives remain distinct. Evidence classification: original parameter and asset service boundary review. Confidence: high for scoped source model values. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 16. Source location: Pelamis methods and corrected SI, or ERS original Table 6; exact retained reference
Evidence: 16. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 17. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 17. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 17. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Commercial maturity stage: mature_commercial. Basis: Curator assessment of the established underlying conventional equipment, fabrication, coating or infrastructure class. The host wave/ERS technology's maturity does not automatically describe the supplier. This is not an author-assigned numerical TRL or certification of exact recipe completeness. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 17. Source location: Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Evidence: 17. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 18. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 18. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 18. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Technology readiness level: 9. Basis: Curator assessment of the established underlying conventional equipment, fabrication, coating or infrastructure class. The host wave/ERS technology's maturity does not automatically describe the supplier. This is not an author-assigned numerical TRL or certification of exact recipe completeness. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 18. Source location: Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Evidence: 18. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 19. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 19. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 19. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Technological representativeness: 4. Basis: Retain existing conservative technology score 4 for source engineering and material/service proxies. Agreement with an individual source parameter does not establish full inventory closure. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 19. Source location: Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Evidence: 19. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 20. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 20. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 20. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Geographical representativeness: 3. Basis: Generic Scottish deployment and UK manufacture with transferred supplier proxies justify curator geography 3 for retained references, not a measured regional-fleet sample. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 20. Source location: Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Evidence: 20. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Evidence: 21. Origin: editor_verification
Evidence: 21. Target field: technology_description
Evidence: 21. Qualification: Technical-characterisation review TC-3241. Temporal representativeness: 4. Basis: Source installation 2006, validity 2006–2010, online 2018, issue 2019 and correction 2022 are different dates. They do not establish an observed annual-output year or current operational representativeness. Use conservative historical/mixed curator temporal score 4. Evidence classification: source scope and explicit curator assessment. Confidence: medium curator judgement. A retained model value is not a measured observation or industrial certification. Source-specific assumptions and detailed technical parameters accompany this plan.
Evidence: 21. Source location: Original methods/SI and exact retained reference, source-vintage and process-boundary qualifications
Evidence: 21. Source reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Publications: 1. Doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Publications: 1. Url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2
Publications: 1. Title: An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Name: R. Camilla Thomson
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 1. Affiliations: 1. Name: School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3DW, UK
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Name: John P. Chick
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 2. Affiliations: 1. Name: School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3DW, UK
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Name: Gareth P. Harrison
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Orcid: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Ror: https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Url: Not set
Publications: 1. Scientific authors: 3. Affiliations: 1. Name: School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3DW, UK
Publications: 1. Citation: R. Camilla Thomson; John P. Chick; Gareth P. Harrison (2019). An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2. Corrected supplementary inventory: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11367-018-1504-2/MediaObjects/11367_2018_1504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf. Correction notice (2022): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-02011-y
Publications: 1. Relation: primary_source
Publications: 1. Source type: scientific_journal
Publications: 1. Publication year: 2019
Version metadata Technology readiness level 5 9
Version metadata Temporal representativeness 2 4
Version metadata Limitations on use Composition proxy for 1 kg of Hempel Curing Agent 97652, based on the safety data sheet and Supplementary Table S1.6. Several constituents are represented by the proxy substances selected by the authors; the unspecified remainder is liquid epoxy resin.

Deterministic source-derived proxy: the paper's ecoinvent 3.3 suppliers and pedigree-based uncertainty model are not reproduced exactly by the current background mappings and central-value inventory. Supplier substitutions remain adaptations, not verified identical processes.		 Source safety-data-sheet ranges and surrogate substances do not establish an exact commercial formulation or validated factory inventory.

Background and uncertainty
The source uses ecoinvent 3.3 and pedigree/lognormal uncertainty with Monte Carlo analysis. Current supplier mappings and deterministic central quantities do not reproduce that full stochastic study. Supplier compatibility, source proxy chemistry and omitted processes remain qualified; matching central values does not validate environmental results.
Version metadata Intended application Not set Represent this specified component, material or operation within the Pelamis P1 foreground hierarchy, using the stated functional reference. Apply reviewed discovery metadata and change explanations from the curated release.
Version metadata Methodology and allocation explanation Not set The selected remainder is 0.51375 kg/kg mixture. Several amine and phenol constituents are represented by different available substances, including separate ethylenediamine rows; these substitutions are retained as proxies.

Study context
This sub-process supports the source’s Pelamis P1 case. Its own reference is distinct from the whole-device rating, 20-year operating life and annual electricity estimate. The 2022 corrected supplement is used; publication/correction dates do not establish this activity’s measurement period.
Version metadata System boundary Not set Selected ingredient supplies per kg curing agent; no independently measured factory manufacture, application emissions or end-of-life process is added.
Version metadata Technology description Composition proxy for 1 kg of Hempel Curing Agent 97652, based on the safety data sheet and Supplementary Table S1.6. Several constituents are represented by the proxy substances selected by the authors; the unspecified remainder is liquid epoxy resin. Solvents, amines, phenol-related and other ingredient proxies follow supplementary Table S1.6; the unspecified remainder is represented by liquid epoxy resin.
Version metadata Name Curing Agent 97652 production curing agent 97652 production Activity and product names now follow consistent catalogue spelling, so the intended inventory and its supplier references remain identifiable.
Review & discussion Publication provenance, scientific review and community discussion.
Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review

Publication route

Curator-led bulk import

This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.

No public review transcript is available for this version.
Discussion 0 public comments · questions, context and problem reports.

Public discussion

Questions and comments are public. The dataset submitter is notified.

Log in to participate
No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version

Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment. To propose better numerical inventory data, use “Suggest an inventory improvement” in the inventory section.

Log in to report content