CLIC Curated Life cycle Inventory Collection

Trucks and lorries

Storage battery

Reference product Storage battery RER

Superseded Version 1.0.0

Stable dataset identity storage-battery

Download Export BibTeX Log in to clone Back to catalog
Unit
unit
Reuse license
CC BY 4.0
Published
2026-07-15
Version
1.0.0
Technology maturity
See quality profile

Published inventory

Overview

Process description and catalog context. View scientific metadata

Description

One stationary buffer-battery reference buying800kWh nominal manufacturing capacity and800tkm freight. Historical supply uses the CONT stationary-battery technology basket. This is a capacity/service adapter, with no direct operating-electricity delivery in the foreground. The earlier Nansai lead-acid battery is a historical source, not the current chemistry recipe.

Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Storage is currently800kWh nominal LFP manufacturing-capacity demand, not800kWh delivered electricity and not a source4000kg lead-acid inventory. Historical CONT market is a different technology basket. Chemistry, mass/capacity transfer, service life, cycling and current supplier boundary need original stationary-battery evidence before changes. Freight800tkm would imply200km at the earlier4tonne mass; that does not certify the LFP system mass.

Dataset details

Classification, keywords, bookmarks and download counts.

Classification
Trucks and lorries (transport/road/trucks)
Bookmarks
0
Raw file downloads
0
Generated export downloads
0

Classification path: Transport > Road transport > Trucks and lorries

Keywords

  • road transport
  • trucks and lorries
  • batteries

Bookmarking is available only on the latest published dataset record.

Metadata & sources Methods, scope, reference years, publications, contributors, projects and funding.

Source

Source documentation, background profiles and references.

Scientific journal publication

Supporting sources: Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0; Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf

Background database
ecoinvent / 3.8
Background system model
cut-off
Biosphere database
ecoinvent / 3.8

These are the stored source profiles for this version. Foreground methodology is recorded in Scientific metadata.

External references

Scientific metadata

Reference years, modelling and allocation methods, contributors, publications, projects and funding.

Declarations describe this version's foreground inventory. Missing information is not evidence of a particular allocation method or data origin.

Source publication year
Not specified
Inventory reference year
Not specified
Foreground modelling approach
Not specified
Allocated product inventory
Not specified
Allocation or multifunctionality treatment
Not specified
Inventory contributions
Not specified
Projects
Not specified
Funding
Not specified
Methodology notes
Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Storage is currently800kWh nominal LFP manufacturing-capacity demand, not800kWh delivered electricity and not a source4000kg lead-acid inventory. Historical CONT market is a different technology basket. Chemistry, mass/capacity transfer, service life, cycling and current supplier boundary need original stationary-battery evidence before changes. Freight800tkm would imply200km at the earlier4tonne mass; that does not certify the LFP system mass.
Process type
Unit process: black box
System boundary
One stationary buffer-battery reference buying800kWh nominal manufacturing capacity and800tkm freight. Historical supply uses the CONT stationary-battery technology basket. This is a capacity/service adapter, with no direct operating-electricity delivery in the foreground. The earlier Nansai lead-acid battery is a historical source, not the current chemistry recipe.
Component/reference-unit manufacturing or aggregate installation only, as specified above. Vehicle operation, grid electricity delivery, efficiency, utilization and pervehicle allocation require separate service models.
Technology description
One stationary buffer-battery reference buying800kWh nominal manufacturing capacity and800tkm freight. Historical supply uses the CONT stationary-battery technology basket. This is a capacity/service adapter, with no direct operating-electricity delivery in the foreground. The earlier Nansai lead-acid battery is a historical source, not the current chemistry recipe.
Intended application
Charging-infrastructure equipment reference for LCA, preserving the exact hardware/capacity/installation basis; not a direct delivered-electricity or vehicle-kilometre inventory.
Use limitations
Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year.
Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions.
Historical200kW charger uses4.3 equivalents of the600kg component, consistent with2×1290/600. ABB's1290kg row is rated100kW, while PSI2023 Table70 calls it200kW; the retained coefficient therefore includes an additional factor2 relative to the report's literal mass wording. Historical450kW scaling is(3×1340+500)/600=7.533333333. Manufacturer masses do not establish linear electrical-power scaling or the2000 electronics fraction in modern hardware.
Current4675 replaces the legacy charger/stand/buffer assembly with1.2 integrated200kW hardware equivalents, one foundation and negative retirement/packaging demands. Current4676 buys the separate450kW station and WEEE demand; it no longer buys the old stand or buffer battery. Preserve these documented equipment-only replacements, including absence of dedicated stationary storage; do not restore Nansai's battery or treat the vehicle-model2020 climate/cycle as this component's measurement year.
Recovered ABB Terra184 PEP ABBG-00284-V01.01-EN was issuedJuly2023, with395kg180kW hardware,25kg packaging,458kg foundation and10year reference life. Its functional unit is1kWh supplied in the defined operating scenario, whereas CLIC hardware outputs one equipment unit. Do not import EPD use-phase electricity, headline impacts or lifetime denominator into component manufacture.
Current200kW hardware scales Terra184 material masses by200/180, giving438.888889kg total,430kg assigned classes and8.888889kg unassigned miscellaneous material. Keep that gap visible instead of normalizing it away. Source steel197kg×200/180 is split between ordinary steel and a grade430 shell within the same budget. Shell geometry/grade, material providers, wood500kg/m3 density and backgrounds are compiler assumptions, not a manufacturer200kW BOM. Source percentages use the full878kg station reference; do not treat them as percentages of395kg hardware.
Current200kW installation retains12/10=1.2 expected hardware equivalents: the hardware's10years is sourced, installation12years is an inherited assumption. Foundation450kg concrete plus8kg steel is purchased/retired once, with2400kg/m3 concrete. WEEE−526.666667kg excludes packaging; wood−29.333333kg and PE−4kg cover all deliveries once. Preserve negative waste-service signs, paired background profiles and absence of double-counted foundation steel. No discrete replacement timetable or recycling credit is inferred.
ABB PantoUP RevB January2021 confirms450kW from three1340kg150kW cabinets,7inch service HMI, and a separate pole/interface specification. It lists45kg contact dome and500kg control-box/pole rows; whether500kg includes the dome is not established here. Current station's500kg support recipe,10m cable, one shared2kg industrial HMI/PLC and aggregate4613.576kg retirement are engineering assumptions, not a certified full station BOM. Do not add a second onboard pantograph to offboard infrastructure without checking callers.
Current charger/stand retain generic-wrought aluminium50/1kg instead of AlLi, and the stand replaces one laptop/17inch screen with an industrial interface/controller. Five current predecessor/rationale hashes are verified. Do not reverse these corrections or infer that8.25kg grouped stand electronics includes the replaced computer/display. Historical recipes and later native zero-laptop entries remain distinct evidence.
Storage is currently800kWh nominal LFP manufacturing-capacity demand, not800kWh delivered electricity and not a source4000kg lead-acid inventory. Historical CONT market is a different technology basket. Chemistry, mass/capacity transfer, service life, cycling and current supplier boundary need original stationary-battery evidence before changes. Freight800tkm would imply200km at the earlier4tonne mass; that does not certify the LFP system mass.
Charger freight120tkm is consistent with600kg×200km. Stand36.05tkm would imply180.25kg at200km versus the earlier100kg total, or360.5km if100kg is retained. This is an unresolved source/functional mass-distance convention; no isolated numerical candidate is proposed. Preserved HMI/PLC changes and stationary-battery chemistry further complicate direct rescaling.
Historical2001 affiliations are supported by NIES annual bibliography: Nansai/Moriguchi at NIES, Tohno/Kasahara at Kyoto University, Kono at Toshiba International Fuel Cells. Nansai's primary ORCID is0000-0002-2449-1874; other unverified identifiers remain blank. Kyoto University (02kpeqv85) is not its museum; NIES (02hw5fp67) is not the Environment Ministry. Toshiba International Fuel Cells is not automatically the parent Toshiba corporation. ABB E-mobility and generic ABB publisher roles remain separate and no unrelated ABB-acronym ROR is assigned.
Primary2001 publisher acknowledgment identifies JSPS Research for the Future project Distributed Autonomous Urban Energy System for Mitigating Environmental Impact,JSPS-RFTF97P01002; recovered2000 paper independently prints the same award. Canonical JSPS (00hhkn466) differs from its London office (02m7axw05). NIES's B-55 research-topic classification is not an interchangeable grant number or proof of funding of later CLIC/ABB adaptations. No funding/project declarations are propagated to these adapters.
Crossmark explicitly reports no available data for the2001 DOI, rather than current status. Scoped DOI/title/erratum/supplement searches locate no authoritative correction, amended supplement or retraction; full2001 text and any historic supplementary inventory remain unavailable locally. Earlier2000 original and2021/2023 manufacturer documents are different sources, not published corrections of2001. ABB PEP issue/revision and PantoUP revision are pinned; later product revisions do not automatically amend this frozen equipment model.
Data origins
Literature
Other fields not yet completed (5)

Data period start year, Data period end year, Valid until year, Multifunctionality applicable, Included life cycle stages

Publications (2)
Citation
Nansai, K.; Tohno, S.; Kono, M.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2001). Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Applied Energy70(3),251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0
Title
Life-cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles
Doi
10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0
Url
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-2619(01)00032-0
Source type
Scientific journal
Publication year
2001
Relation
Supporting source
Authors
Keisuke Nansai · 0000-0002-2449-1874; Susumu Tohno; Motoki Kono; Mikio Kasahara; Yuichi Moriguchi
Citation
Nansai, K.; Kono, M.; Tohno, S.; Kasahara, M.; Moriguchi, Y. (2000). Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles. Energy and Resources21(3),274–281. https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf
Title
Life Cycle Analysis of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles
Url
https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf
Source type
Scientific journal
Publication year
2000
Relation
Supporting source
Authors
Keisuke Nansai · 0000-0002-2449-1874; Motoki Kono; Susumu Tohno; Mikio Kasahara; Yuichi Moriguchi
Evidence and qualifications (6)
Target field
data_origins
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
source
Qualification
Exact source/adaptation evidence; a battery component used in transport is included under the explicitly authorized battery-production exception. Vehicle and transport activities remain excluded.
Target field
data_origins
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
Existing published CLIC inventory documentation
Source location
description
Qualification
Exact source/adaptation evidence; a battery component used in transport is included under the explicitly authorized battery-production exception. Vehicle and transport activities remain excluded.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0306-2619%2801%2900032-0
Source location
DOI registration: title, publication dates and byline
Qualification
Bibliographic details refer to this explicitly cited DOI. Existing citation text is retained, including any additional sources. Publication year does not establish the inventory reference year; publication authors are not assigned as inventory compilers.
Target field
publications
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://www.nies.go.jp/en/pr/publications/annual/ae-9-2003.pdf
Source location
NIES2003 annual bibliography, printed106; byline and historical external affiliations
Qualification
Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Historical2001 affiliations are supported by NIES annual bibliography: Nansai/Moriguchi at NIES, Tohno/Kasahara at Kyoto University, Kono at Toshiba International Fuel Cells. Nansai's primary ORCID is0000-0002-2449-1874; other unverified identifiers remain blank. Kyoto University (02kpeqv85) is not its museum; NIES (02hw5fp67) is not the Environment Ministry. Toshiba International Fuel Cells is not automatically the parent Toshiba corporation. ABB E-mobility and generic ABB publisher roles remain separate and no unrelated ABB-acronym ROR is assigned.
Target field
methodology_notes
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf
Source location
Original source tables and frozen revision rationale
Qualification
Source roles and limits: Nansai2001 AppliedEnergy70(3),251–265 has five ordered authors: Keisuke Nansai, Susumu Tohno, Motoki Kono, Mikio Kasahara and Yuichi Moriguchi. The2000 Japanese original is separately recovered: authors place Kono before Tohno. Its Table3 is an earlier numerical comparator, not proof that every2001 table is identical. Do not replace2001 date/byline with2000 or confuse server upload2021 with publication year. Earlier2000 Table3, printed277/PDF4, lists600kg charger: iron400, copper80, aluminium50 and70kg grouped electronics. Stand100kg comprises iron73, copper11, aluminium1, computer4.5, card reader1.5, display2.25 and other6.75. Stationary lead-acid storage4000kg includes lead2400kg and560kg30percent sulfuric-acid solution. These are not measured stainless18/8, AlLi, industrial HMI/PLC or LFP compositions. Storage is currently800kWh nominal LFP manufacturing-capacity demand, not800kWh delivered electricity and not a source4000kg lead-acid inventory. Historical CONT market is a different technology basket. Chemistry, mass/capacity transfer, service life, cycling and current supplier boundary need original stationary-battery evidence before changes. Freight800tkm would imply200km at the earlier4tonne mass; that does not certify the LFP system mass.
Target field
funding
Origin
Editor verification
Source reference
https://www.jser.gr.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21-274.pdf
Source location
2000 printed281 acknowledgment;2001 publisher acknowledgment preview
Qualification
Primary2001 publisher acknowledgment identifies JSPS Research for the Future project Distributed Autonomous Urban Energy System for Mitigating Environmental Impact,JSPS-RFTF97P01002; recovered2000 paper independently prints the same award. Canonical JSPS (00hhkn466) differs from its London office (02m7axw05). NIES's B-55 research-topic classification is not an interchangeable grant number or proof of funding of later CLIC/ABB adaptations. No funding/project declarations are propagated to these adapters.
Technology characterization Scale, utilization, production, lifetime, technology readiness and representativeness.
Commercial maturity stage
Early commercial
Design capacity
100
Design capacity unit
kW
Capacity factor
Not provided
Annual production volume
Not provided
Annual production volume unit
Not provided
Annual production volume year
Not provided
Plant lifetime
24 years
TRL scale Higher is more mature. 9: routine commercial deployment 8: commercial, but still niche or scaling 7: first-commercial or advanced demonstration 6: engineering-scale demonstration 5: pilot or large prototype 4: bench or lab validated 3: research-stage concept Technology readiness level
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: strong market- or operating-data basis 2: commercially plausible, but still somewhat specific 3: partly representative, with modelling or adaptation bias 4: pilot, proxy-based, scaled-up, or prospective 5: weak representation of the real technology state Technological representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: geography matches the claimed scope well 2: regionally credible, but broader or less exact 3: generic regional or global proxy 4: weak proxy or clear geographic mismatch 5: geography is effectively unsupported Geographical representativeness
1 to 5 scale Lower is better. 1: current for that technology class 2: slightly dated, but still good 3: dated enough to need caution 4: stale, pilot-era, or prospective relative to current practice 5: clearly not representative of the current state Temporal representativeness

Missing exchange uncertainty generation: Not requested

Representativeness scores use a 1–5 scale when provided. Lower scores indicate a closer fit to the modeled technology, geography, or time period.

Inventory & impacts 3 exchanges · exchange table, supply-chain graph and environmental screening.

Precalculated screening profile

Environmental impacts

Results per unit, using UVEK 2025 and the ecoinvent 3.10 biosphere. Exchange rows are shaded from green to red by relative contribution to the selected indicator.

Climate change 137.897 kg CO2-Eq / unit
Partial screening score

1 of 2 non-zero exchanges were scored (50%). Unmapped exchanges are excluded, not treated as zero.

Screening result

This screening result uses Brightpath mappings from the source background to UVEK 2025; mapped suppliers are not claims of scientific equivalence.

Show all 16 indicator totals
Acidification 0.482365 mol H+-Eq / unit
Climate change 137.897 kg CO2-Eq / unit
Freshwater ecotoxicity 357.492 CTUe / unit
Freshwater eutrophication 0.0135104 kg P-Eq / unit
Marine eutrophication 0.180741 kg N-Eq / unit
Terrestrial eutrophication 1.93816 mol N-Eq / unit
Human toxicity, cancer 4.9444e-08 CTUh / unit
Human toxicity, non-cancer 1.0894e-06 CTUh / unit
Ionising radiation 16.125 kBq U235-Eq / unit
Land use 605.489 dimensionless / unit
Ozone depletion 4.7153e-06 kg CFC-11-Eq / unit
Particulate matter 4.1962e-06 disease incidence / unit
Photochemical ozone formation 0.774758 kg NMVOC-Eq / unit
Resource use, fossils 2019.67 MJ, net calorific value / unit
Resource use, minerals and metals 0.000350154 kg Sb-Eq / unit
Water use 175.861 m3 world Eq deprived / unit
Calculation details

Profile uvek-2025-ef-v3-1-4e70d56a85b1 · artifact 4e70d56a85b1 · calculated 2026-11-09 12:48 UTC. These screening results do not replace a reviewed comparative LCA.

Dataset contents

Reference flows, emissions, technosphere inputs, and natural resources in this published snapshot.

Outputs

Reference flow 1 row Reference production exchanges extracted from the uploaded inventory.
Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
Storage battery
RER
Storage battery
1
unit
Metadata (1)
Tag
other
 Reference flow

Inputs

Technosphere inputs 2 rows Linked foreground or background product inputs used by this dataset.
Exchange Reference / categories Amount Unit Metadata Climate change contribution
market for battery capacity, stationary (CONT scenario)
GLO
electricity storage capacity
800
kilowatt hour
Metadata (1)
Tag
energy storage
 Not scored — no BAFU factor
market for transport, freight, lorry >32 metric ton, EURO6
RER
transport, freight, lorry >32 metric ton, EURO6
800
ton kilometer
Metadata (1)
Tag
other
137.897 kg CO2-Eq / unit 100.0% of total
BAFU:2025
Parameters 0 source definitions · values, formulas and uncertainty.

Read-only definitions preserved with this inventory version. Values are supplied by the source; CLIC does not evaluate formulas or recalculate exchange amounts and impact scores from them.

No parameter definitions were supplied with this inventory snapshot.

Reuse and provenance

Downloads & files

This historical version remains available for citation and download, but a newer public version is now current.

Add to download basket

Original source files are currently unavailable, but you can still add this version to your basket for generated package export.

Log in to add to basket
Raw uploaded files 0 files preserved with this version.
Original uploaded files were not included in the inventory archive. Generated inventory exports remain available.
Versions & changes 2 versions · change rationale, release notes and comparisons.

Version history

A newer public version is active, but this superseded record remains available for citation and reproducibility.

Oldest to newest. Arrows show recorded revision links; each node describes the change introduced by that version.

  • Version 1.0.1 revises version 1.0.0.
  1. Version 1.0.0
    Published

    First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison.

    Superseded · Viewing
  2. Version 1.0.1
    Published

    Uses the documented storage battery reference: This dataset represents a stationary storage battery used as part of electric-vehicle charging infrastructure rather than as an…

    Published · Latest
Show full version history table (2 versions)
Version Published Reason for this version Link
Version 1.0.1 2026-11-03 Uses the documented storage battery reference: This dataset represents a stationary storage battery used as part of electric-vehicle charging infrastructure rather than as an onboard traction battery. Open version
Version 1.0.0 Superseded Published 2026-07-15 First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison. Current view
View latest published version Back to browse
About this version

About this version

First published inventory; no earlier version is available for comparison.

Review & discussion Publication provenance, scientific review and community discussion.
Public review record Curator-led bulk import. Public evidence is shown without participant accounts, assignments, recommendations, or private editor notes. Show review Hide review

Publication route

Curator-led bulk import

This inventory was restored from a public CLIC archive. Its original publication route is Curator-led bulk import; private review and workflow records were not transferred.

Source inventory archive

No public review transcript is available for this version.
Discussion 0 public comments · questions, context and problem reports.

Public discussion

This discussion record remains visible, but new public comments should be added on the latest published version instead of this superseded one.

No public comments yet. Start the discussion if you have a question about this inventory.
Report this dataset or version

Use this form to report a problem with this dataset or version. To report an individual public comment, use “Report this comment” beside that comment.

Log in to report content